Journal of Inorganic Materials ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1507-1516.DOI: 10.15541/jim20260049
• RESEARCH ARTICLE • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Zhiping1,2(
), DUAN Zhenyang1, YU Haoshan1, ZHOU Wenwu1,2, YANG Zhiyuan1,2, ZHOU Anning1,2
Received:2026-01-27
Revised:2026-04-04
Published:2026-10-20
Online:2026-04-16
About author:CHEN Zhiping (1982-), male, associate professor. E-mail: cupczp@163.com
Supported by:CLC Number:
CHEN Zhiping, DUAN Zhenyang, YU Haoshan, ZHOU Wenwu, YANG Zhiyuan, ZHOU Anning. ZSM-5 Molecular Sieves: Preparation from Coal Gasification Slag and Performance in Methanol to Aromatics[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(10): 1507-1516.
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of ZSM-5 molecular sieves synthesized from CGS activated under different conditions (a) Slag-to-alkali ratio; (b) Alkali concentration; (c) Activation temperature; (d) Activation time
Fig. 3 XRD patterns of ZSM-5 molecular sieves synthesized under different crystallization conditions (a) Template dosage; (b) pH of the crystallization system; (c) Crystallization time; (d) Crystallization temperature
| Sample | SBET/(m2·g-1) | SMicro/(m2·g-1) | SMeso/(m2·g-1) | Vtotal/(cm3·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGS | 36 | 7 | 29 | 0.04 |
| A-CGS | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0.01 |
| ZSM-5 | 193 | 118 | 75 | 0.15 |
Table 1 Pore structure parameters of CGS, A-CGS and ZSM-5
| Sample | SBET/(m2·g-1) | SMicro/(m2·g-1) | SMeso/(m2·g-1) | Vtotal/(cm3·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGS | 36 | 7 | 29 | 0.04 |
| A-CGS | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0.01 |
| ZSM-5 | 193 | 118 | 75 | 0.15 |
| T/℃ | Sample | Acid amount/(μmol·g-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | L | B+L | B/L | ||
| 150 | ZSM-5 | 224.95 | 71.09 | 296.04 | 3.16 |
| Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 128.24 | 458.48 | 586.72 | 0.28 | |
| 250 | ZSM-5 | 208.82 | 34.14 | 242.96 | 6.12 |
| Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 111.48 | 314.49 | 425.97 | 0.35 | |
| 350 | ZSM-5 | 197.50 | 28.35 | 225.85 | 6.97 |
| Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 66.72 | 192.85 | 259.58 | 0.35 | |
Table 2 Py-IR acidic properties of ZSM-5 and Zn/H-ZSM-5
| T/℃ | Sample | Acid amount/(μmol·g-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | L | B+L | B/L | ||
| 150 | ZSM-5 | 224.95 | 71.09 | 296.04 | 3.16 |
| Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 128.24 | 458.48 | 586.72 | 0.28 | |
| 250 | ZSM-5 | 208.82 | 34.14 | 242.96 | 6.12 |
| Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 111.48 | 314.49 | 425.97 | 0.35 | |
| 350 | ZSM-5 | 197.50 | 28.35 | 225.85 | 6.97 |
| Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 66.72 | 192.85 | 259.58 | 0.35 | |
| Alkane/% | Alkene/% | Aromatic/% | BTX/% | Catalyst | Reaction condition | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.8 | 33.0 | 45.0 | 31.4 | Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 0.1 MPa, 450 ℃, 5 h-1 | This work |
| 36.8 | 33.7 | 23.1 | 19.0 | Zn/ZSM-5 | 0.1 MPa, 450 ℃, 10 h-1 | [ |
| - | - | 59.1 | 34.6 | Zn-Z5-2 | 0.1 MPa, 440 ℃, 1 h-1 | [ |
| 13.9 | 50.6 | 26.9 | 13.3 | ZSM-5-5% | 0.1 MPa, 450 ℃, 2 h-1 | [ |
Table 3 Comparison of product distributions of the same series catalysts
| Alkane/% | Alkene/% | Aromatic/% | BTX/% | Catalyst | Reaction condition | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.8 | 33.0 | 45.0 | 31.4 | Zn/H-ZSM-5 | 0.1 MPa, 450 ℃, 5 h-1 | This work |
| 36.8 | 33.7 | 23.1 | 19.0 | Zn/ZSM-5 | 0.1 MPa, 450 ℃, 10 h-1 | [ |
| - | - | 59.1 | 34.6 | Zn-Z5-2 | 0.1 MPa, 440 ℃, 1 h-1 | [ |
| 13.9 | 50.6 | 26.9 | 13.3 | ZSM-5-5% | 0.1 MPa, 450 ℃, 2 h-1 | [ |
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | Na2O | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 49.32 | 14.95 | 11.13 | 10.97 | 2.26 | 1.41 | 9.96 |
Table S1 Main components of CGS
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | Na2O | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 49.32 | 14.95 | 11.13 | 10.97 | 2.26 | 1.41 | 9.96 |
| C/A | 1 : 0.6 | 1 : 0.8 | 1 : 1.0 | 1 : 1.2 | 1 : 1.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative crystallinity/% | 72.5 | 79.4 | 87.3 | 98.3 | 91.1 |
| Alkali concentration/ (mol·L-1) | 4.37 | 5.21 | 6.10 | 7.01 | 7.96 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 92.2 | 93.8 | 98.2 | 80.5 | 81.3 |
| Activation temperature/℃ | 140 | 160 | 180 | 200 | 220 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 69.8 | 72.7 | 83.6 | 97.6 | 94.3 |
| Activation time/h | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 56.3 | 82.1 | 103.5 | 104.1 | 104.3 |
Table S2 Influence of activation conditions on the relative crystallinity of ZSM-5 molecular sieves
| C/A | 1 : 0.6 | 1 : 0.8 | 1 : 1.0 | 1 : 1.2 | 1 : 1.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative crystallinity/% | 72.5 | 79.4 | 87.3 | 98.3 | 91.1 |
| Alkali concentration/ (mol·L-1) | 4.37 | 5.21 | 6.10 | 7.01 | 7.96 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 92.2 | 93.8 | 98.2 | 80.5 | 81.3 |
| Activation temperature/℃ | 140 | 160 | 180 | 200 | 220 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 69.8 | 72.7 | 83.6 | 97.6 | 94.3 |
| Activation time/h | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 56.3 | 82.1 | 103.5 | 104.1 | 104.3 |
| TPABr/SiO2 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative crystallinity/% | 43.2 | 63.3 | 109.6 | 110.3 | 115.4 |
| pH | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 56.6 | 94.3 | 113.2 | 105.2 | 86.1 |
| Crystallization time/h | 48 | 60 | 72 | 84 | 96 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 10.8 | 68.4 | 96.1 | 95.3 | 86.3 |
| Crystallization temperature/℃ | 120 | 140 | 160 | 180 | |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 63.2 | 85.3 | 96.6 | 100.2 |
Table S3 Influence of crystallization conditions on the relative crystallinity of ZSM-5 molecular sieves
| TPABr/SiO2 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative crystallinity/% | 43.2 | 63.3 | 109.6 | 110.3 | 115.4 |
| pH | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 56.6 | 94.3 | 113.2 | 105.2 | 86.1 |
| Crystallization time/h | 48 | 60 | 72 | 84 | 96 |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 10.8 | 68.4 | 96.1 | 95.3 | 86.3 |
| Crystallization temperature/℃ | 120 | 140 | 160 | 180 | |
| Relative crystallinity/% | 63.2 | 85.3 | 96.6 | 100.2 |
| T/℃ | Production selectivity/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methane | Ethane | Propane | Isobutane | n-butane | |
| 400 | 2.26 | 5.99 | 10.73 | 2.01 | 3.98 |
| 425 | 2.55 | 4.88 | 7.22 | 3.18 | 1.70 |
| 450 | 3.73 | 3.31 | 6.01 | 2.28 | 1.24 |
| 475 | 5.97 | 2.52 | 4.82 | 1.72 | 1.33 |
| 500 | 10.97 | 2.39 | 2.74 | 2.40 | 1.65 |
Table S4 Influence of temperature on the distributions of alkane products
| T/℃ | Production selectivity/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methane | Ethane | Propane | Isobutane | n-butane | |
| 400 | 2.26 | 5.99 | 10.73 | 2.01 | 3.98 |
| 425 | 2.55 | 4.88 | 7.22 | 3.18 | 1.70 |
| 450 | 3.73 | 3.31 | 6.01 | 2.28 | 1.24 |
| 475 | 5.97 | 2.52 | 4.82 | 1.72 | 1.33 |
| 500 | 10.97 | 2.39 | 2.74 | 2.40 | 1.65 |
| T/℃ | Production selectivity/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethene | Propene | Trans-2- butene | 1-butene | Cis-2- butene | Isobutene | |
| 400 | 7.10 | 11.78 | 4.84 | 3.82 | 2.34 | 2.33 |
| 425 | 7.30 | 11.59 | 5.20 | 4.10 | 2.60 | 2.49 |
| 450 | 7.65 | 12.65 | 5.30 | 4.43 | 2.65 | 2.51 |
| 475 | 7.48 | 13.50 | 5.36 | 4.52 | 2.57 | 2.44 |
| 500 | 6.11 | 15.55 | 4.78 | 2.82 | 1.76 | 2.14 |
Table S5 Influence of temperature on the distribution of alkene products
| T/℃ | Production selectivity/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethene | Propene | Trans-2- butene | 1-butene | Cis-2- butene | Isobutene | |
| 400 | 7.10 | 11.78 | 4.84 | 3.82 | 2.34 | 2.33 |
| 425 | 7.30 | 11.59 | 5.20 | 4.10 | 2.60 | 2.49 |
| 450 | 7.65 | 12.65 | 5.30 | 4.43 | 2.65 | 2.51 |
| 475 | 7.48 | 13.50 | 5.36 | 4.52 | 2.57 | 2.44 |
| 500 | 6.11 | 15.55 | 4.78 | 2.82 | 1.76 | 2.14 |
| T/℃ | Production selectivity/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | Toluene | Ethylbenzene | p-xylene | o-xylene | m-methyl ethylbenzene | p-methyl ethylbenzene | 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene | |
| 400 | 5.07 | 9.69 | 2.08 | 4.62 | 2.54 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 1.36 | 1.18 | 0.46 |
| 425 | 5.17 | 11.68 | 1.87 | 4.64 | 2.77 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 2.40 | 1.42 | 0.75 |
| 450 | 4.87 | 11.59 | 2.05 | 4.67 | 2.63 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 3.07 | 1.92 | 0.70 |
| 475 | 4.53 | 9.72 | 1.76 | 4.18 | 2.62 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 2.72 | 1.91 | 0.60 |
| 500 | 3.71 | 8.19 | 1.13 | 3.75 | 1.70 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 2.03 | 1.64 | 0.36 |
Table S6 Influence of temperature on the distribution of aromatic products
| T/℃ | Production selectivity/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | Toluene | Ethylbenzene | p-xylene | o-xylene | m-methyl ethylbenzene | p-methyl ethylbenzene | 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene | |
| 400 | 5.07 | 9.69 | 2.08 | 4.62 | 2.54 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 1.36 | 1.18 | 0.46 |
| 425 | 5.17 | 11.68 | 1.87 | 4.64 | 2.77 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 2.40 | 1.42 | 0.75 |
| 450 | 4.87 | 11.59 | 2.05 | 4.67 | 2.63 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 3.07 | 1.92 | 0.70 |
| 475 | 4.53 | 9.72 | 1.76 | 4.18 | 2.62 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 2.72 | 1.91 | 0.60 |
| 500 | 3.71 | 8.19 | 1.13 | 3.75 | 1.70 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 2.03 | 1.64 | 0.36 |
| WHSV/h-1 | Production selectivity/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methane | Ethane | Propane | Isobutane | n-butane | |
| 5 | 4.37 | 3.72 | 5.43 | 2.83 | 1.44 |
| 10 | 3.73 | 3.31 | 6.01 | 2.28 | 1.24 |
| 15 | 3.52 | 3.30 | 6.09 | 2.12 | 1.13 |
| 20 | 3.64 | 3.17 | 6.13 | 2.09 | 1.01 |
Table S7 Influence of WHSV on the distributions of alkane products
| WHSV/h-1 | Production selectivity/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methane | Ethane | Propane | Isobutane | n-butane | |
| 5 | 4.37 | 3.72 | 5.43 | 2.83 | 1.44 |
| 10 | 3.73 | 3.31 | 6.01 | 2.28 | 1.24 |
| 15 | 3.52 | 3.30 | 6.09 | 2.12 | 1.13 |
| 20 | 3.64 | 3.17 | 6.13 | 2.09 | 1.01 |
| WHSV/ h-1 | Production selectivity/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethene | Propene | Trans-2- butene | 1-butene | Cis-2- Butene | Isobutene | |
| 5 | 6.97 | 11.79 | 4.76 | 4.31 | 2.42 | 2.44 |
| 10 | 7.65 | 12.65 | 5.30 | 4.43 | 2.65 | 2.51 |
| 15 | 10.08 | 15.16 | 5.83 | 4.95 | 2.88 | 2.58 |
| 20 | 13.83 | 15.74 | 7.44 | 6.54 | 4.65 | 1.97 |
Table S8 Influence of WHSV on the distributions of alkene products
| WHSV/ h-1 | Production selectivity/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethene | Propene | Trans-2- butene | 1-butene | Cis-2- Butene | Isobutene | |
| 5 | 6.97 | 11.79 | 4.76 | 4.31 | 2.42 | 2.44 |
| 10 | 7.65 | 12.65 | 5.30 | 4.43 | 2.65 | 2.51 |
| 15 | 10.08 | 15.16 | 5.83 | 4.95 | 2.88 | 2.58 |
| 20 | 13.83 | 15.74 | 7.44 | 6.54 | 4.65 | 1.97 |
| WHSV/ h-1 | Production selectivity/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | Toluene | Ethylbenzene | p-xylene | o-xylene | m-methyl ethylbenzene | p-methyl ethylbenzene | 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene | |
| 5 | 6.09 | 15.58 | 3.48 | 6.19 | 3.52 | 0.82 | 1.02 | 4.22 | 3.13 | 0.94 |
| 10 | 6.14 | 14.63 | 2.59 | 5.90 | 3.31 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 3.88 | 2.43 | 0.89 |
| 15 | 5.59 | 14.59 | 2.40 | 5.68 | 2.83 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 3.42 | 1.69 | 0.61 |
| 20 | 3.47 | 11.33 | 1.72 | 6.02 | 3.50 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 2.77 | 1.79 | 0.58 |
Table S9 Influence of WHSV on the distributions of aromatic products
| WHSV/ h-1 | Production selectivity/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzene | Toluene | Ethylbenzene | p-xylene | o-xylene | m-methyl ethylbenzene | p-methyl ethylbenzene | 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene | 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene | |
| 5 | 6.09 | 15.58 | 3.48 | 6.19 | 3.52 | 0.82 | 1.02 | 4.22 | 3.13 | 0.94 |
| 10 | 6.14 | 14.63 | 2.59 | 5.90 | 3.31 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 3.88 | 2.43 | 0.89 |
| 15 | 5.59 | 14.59 | 2.40 | 5.68 | 2.83 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 3.42 | 1.69 | 0.61 |
| 20 | 3.47 | 11.33 | 1.72 | 6.02 | 3.50 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 2.77 | 1.79 | 0.58 |
| [1] |
HAN R, ZHANG N N, ZHOU A N, et al. Insight into resource recoverability and environmental hazards of coal gasification fine slag from trace element distribution perspective. Fuel, 2024, 366: 131407.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
WANG W D, LIU D H, TU Y N, et al. Enrichment of residual carbon in entrained-flow gasification coal fine slag by ultrasonic flotation. Fuel, 2020, 278: 118195.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 王双明, 刘浪, 朱梦博, 等. “双碳”目标下煤炭绿色低碳发展新思路. 煤炭学报, 2024, 49(1): 152. |
| [4] |
DAI G F, ZHENG S J, WANG X B, et al. Combustibility analysis of high-carbon fine slags from an entrained flow gasifier. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 271: 111009.
DOI URL |
| [5] | 吴锦文, 邓小伟, 焦飞硕, 等. 煤基灰/渣的大宗固废资源化利用现状及发展趋势. 煤炭科学技术, 2024, 52(6): 238. |
| [6] | 李宇, 王建敏, 张弦, 等. 高附加值煤气化渣基材料开发研究进展. 材料导报, 2023, 37(23): 90. |
| [7] | 李梦杰, 李鹏, 范桂侠. 煤气化渣的高值化利用研究进展. 煤化工, 2023, 51(1): 47. |
| [8] | 冯向港, 王海燕, 葛奋飞, 等. 煤气化渣高值化利用的研究进展及应用展望. 洁净煤技术, 2023, 29(11): 122. |
| [9] |
LIU X D, JIN Z W, JING Y H, et al. Review of the characteristics and graded utilisation of coal gasification slag. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2021, 35: 92.
DOI |
| [10] |
CINGO X, NQOMBOLO A, MPUPA A, et al. Valorisation of coal gasification slag and fly ash to mesoporous activated carbon@zeolite socony mobil-5 composite for preconcentration of pharmaceuticals and their removal. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2024, 17(7): 105838.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
JI W X, FENG N, ZHAO P D, et al. Synthesis of single-phase zeolite a by coal gasification fine slag from ningdong and its application as a high-efficiency adsorbent for Cu2+ and Pb2+ in simulated waste water. ChemEngineering, 2020, 4(4): 65.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
XU L Y, DONG K M, GUO F Q, et al. Synthesis of zeolite-based porous catalysts from coal gasification fine slag for steam reforming of toluene. Energy, 2023, 274: 127294.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
张国卿, 宋舒波, 王兴瑞, 等. 煤固废基分子筛的制备及其应用进展. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2311.
DOI |
| [14] | 赵艾靖, 袁宁, 黄麒, 等. 煤基固废制备纳米多孔材料研究进展. 煤质技术, 2021, 36(2): 1. |
| [15] |
马晶, 马玉龙, 朱莉, 等. 不同方法对煤气化粗渣中硅铝矿物的活化. 化工进展, 2025, 44(7): 4251.
DOI |
| [16] |
ZHAO H Y, ZHANG K J, ZHANG H S, et al. HZSM-5 synthesized from montmorillonite activated by different method as an efficient solid acid for steam reforming of dimethyl ether. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2024, 51(2): 1.
DOI |
| [17] | 向永生, 胡晓荣, 岳源源, 等. 以天然矿物为全部硅铝源低成本绿色合成ZSM-5分子筛的研究. 分子催化, 2019, 33(3): 219. |
| [18] |
JIAN C Z, ZHOU Y K, JIANG M Z, et al. Pressure oxidative leaching of chromite in the NaOH-NaNO3-H2O binary sub-molten reaction medium. Minerals Engineering, 2024, 218: 108971.
DOI URL |
| [19] | 杨金彪. 天然硅铝矿物的拟固相活化及其在分子筛合成中的应用. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京)博士学位论文, 2017. |
| [20] | 刘存, 李雲, 郭宏飞, 等. 亚熔盐活化含钾岩石制备球形羟基钙霞石. 高校化学工程学报, 2023, 37(4): 623. |
| [21] |
YUE Y Y, LIU H Y, YUAN P, et al. From natural aluminosilicate minerals to hierarchical ZSM-5 zeolites: a nanoscale depolymerization-reorganization approach. Journal of Catalysis, 2014, 319: 200.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
XUE Y F, LI J F, WANG P F, et al. Regulating Al distribution of ZSM-5 by Sn incorporation for improving catalytic properties in methanol to olefins. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 280: 119391.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
SUN H Q, SONG J, QI T. Separation of Zr and Si in zirconium silicate by sodium hydroxide sub-molten salt. Metals, 2024, 14(6): 630.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
CHEN J, GUO S H, OMRAN M, et al. Microwave-assisted preparation of nanocluster rutile TiO2 from titanium slag by NaOH-KOH mixture activation. Advanced Powder Technology, 2022, 33(5): 103549.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
LIU Y, DENG S, FENG Y X, et al. Synthesis of pollucite ceramics for immobilizing molten salt waste via sub/supercritical hydrothermal. Ceramics International, 2025, 51(24): 43424.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
JANGI I, VAEZI M J. A comparative study on the synthesis parameters of mesoporous MFI zeolite and the effect of temperature on the zeolite-template interaction. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 2024, 60(1): 47.
DOI |
| [27] |
SÁNCHEZ M, DÍAZ R D, CÓRDOVA T, et al. Study of template interactions in MFI and MEL zeolites using quantum methods. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2015, 203: 91.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
LI H, YU J Y, DU K, et al. Synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite nanosheets with tunable silanol nest contents across an ultra-wide pH range and their catalytic validation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2024, 63(24): e202405092.
DOI URL |
| [29] | DONG Y H, ZHANG D, LI D G, et al. Control of Ostwald ripening. Science China Materials, 2023, 66(3): 1249. |
| [30] |
WANG X C, JIAO C Y, JI Z, et al. Polycrystalline ZSM-5 aggregates induced by seed and catalytic performance in methanol to hydrocarbon. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 39(8): 945.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
LIU Q H, FANG Y P, MIAO C H, et al. Preparation of ZSM-5 molecular sieve modified by Kaolin and its CO2 adsorption performance investigation. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2023, 360: 112678.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
WEI J W, ZHANG L J, GENG L L, et al. Novel CO2 adsorbent prepared with ZSM-5/MCM-48 as support: high adsorption property and its mechanism. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(7): 833.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
GAO W, QI G D, WANG Q, et al. Dual active sites on molybdenum/ZSM-5 catalyst for methane dehydroaromatization: insights from solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(19): 10709.
DOI URL |
| [34] | 姚乃瑜, 曹景沛, 赵静平, 等. CTAB辅助晶种法合成Zn/ZSM-5催化剂及其在催化重整纤维素挥发分的作用. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(6): 2359. |
| [35] | 杜浩帆. 改性ZSM-5分子筛上甲醇芳构化动力学研究. 北京: 北京化工大学硕士学位论文, 2023. |
| [36] |
SHANG Y H, GAO Z W, ZHANG M, et al. Decoupling aromatic yield and coke formation in methanol-to-aromatic reaction on Zn(II) exchanged H-ZSM-5 zeolite. ChemCatChem, 2024, 16(20): e202400810.
DOI URL |
| [37] |
周末, 康承琳, 岳欣, 等. C8芳烃异构化反应机理及催化剂研究进展. 石油化工, 2023, 52(12): 1735.
DOI |
| [38] |
GONG Q, FANG T, XIE Y L, et al. High-efficiency conversion of methanol to BTX aromatics over a Zn-modified nanosheet-HZSM-5 zeolite. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(4): 1633.
DOI URL |
| [39] |
MA H, SUN Y, YU J P, et al. Theoretical study on the influence of ZSM-5 zeolite with different structures for methanol to aromatics. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2020, 294: 109838.
DOI URL |
| [40] |
LI H, DONG P, JI D, et al. Effect of the post-treatment of HZSM-5 on catalytic performance for methanol to aromatics. ChemistrySelect, 2020, 5: 3413.
DOI URL |
| [41] | 刘娟娟. ZSM-5分子筛骨架铝落位及酸性对甲醇制芳烃催化性能的影响研究. 太原: 太原理工大学硕士学位论文, 2024. |
| [42] | 杭德智, 刘民, 郭新闻. 纤维素辅助制备多级孔ZSM-5分子筛的催化甲醇制芳烃性能. 石油学报(石油加工), 2025, 41(5): 1258. |
| [1] | LIU Xuzi, SONG Zhaohua, ZENG Lu, QU Li, JIAO Yi, JIANG Fajun, LI Dacheng, YAN Huicheng, WANG Jianli, CHEN Yaoqiang. Deactivation Mechanism of Pd Only Three-way Catalysts under Aging Temperature Gradient [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(8): 1148-1156. |
| [2] | SHEN Xuesong, XIE Kaifeng, XUE Qiang, ZHENG Guozhu, XIAO Guoping, CHEN Ting, CHEN Wenmiao, WANG Shaorong. High-efficiency Construction and Performance Optimization of Surface-modified LSCF-GDC Multiphase Composite Air Electrodes [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(7): 965-973. |
| [3] | WANG Junbu, HUANG Zeai, YANG Mingkai, MENG Ying, ZHOU Mingwei, ZHOU Ying. Research Progress on Anti-coking Catalytic Materials for Methane Conversion [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(6): 739-750. |
| [4] | LI Na, WEI Jin, CAO Ruixiao, LIU Yu, HUANG Guiwen, XIAO Hongmei. Self-developed Ortho-para Hydrogen Conversion Catalyst: Catalytic Testing and Optimization of Batch Preparation Process [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(5): 645-652. |
| [5] | XUE Xinyan, ZHANG Xiaowei, LU Heng, LI Shijie, ZHANG Weike, CHAN Siewhwa. Co-Mg Synergistic Carbon Nano Onions Catalyst: Preparation and Low-temperature Catalytic Hydrogen Production from Ammonia Decomposition [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(4): 500-508. |
| [6] | HUANG Yinghe, HUANG Renxing, SHI Yuxing, LEI Yijie, YU Tao, WANG Cheng, GU Jun. Enhancing Durability of Pt Catalysts in the Oxygen Reduction Reaction by Confinement Effect of Mesoporous Carbon [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(3): 289-294. |
| [7] | REN Xianpei, LI Chao, HU Qiwei, XIANG Hui, PENG Yuehong. Research Progress on Mott-Schottky Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts Based on Metal/Transition Metal Compounds [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(2): 137-149. |
| [8] | WU Boyu, ZHANG Shengen, ZHANG Shengyang, LIU Bo, ZHANG Bolin. Effect of CeO2 on Low-temperature Denitrification Performance of MnOx Catalysts and Its Mechanism [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(1): 87-95. |
| [9] | LIU Jiangping, GUAN Xin, TANG Zhenjie, ZHU Wenjie, LUO Yongming. Research Progress on Catalytic Oxidation of Nitrogen-containing Volatile Organic Compounds [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(9): 933-943. |
| [10] | GUO Ziyu, ZHU Yunzhou, WANG Li, CHEN Jian, LI Hong, HUANG Zhengren. Effect of Zn2+ Catalyst on Microporous Structure of Porous Carbon Prepared from Phenolic Resin/Ethylene Glycol [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(5): 466-472. |
| [11] | LI Jianjun, CHEN Fangming, ZHANG Lili, WANG Lei, ZHANG Liting, CHEN Huiwen, XUE Changguo, XU Liangji. Peroxymonosulfate Activation by CoFe2O4/MgAl-LDH Catalyst for the Boosted Degradation of Antibiotic [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(4): 440-448. |
| [12] | XIN Zhenyu, GUO Ruihua, WUREN Tuoya, WANG Yan, AN Shengli, ZHANG Guofang, GUAN Lili. Pt-Fe/GO Nanocatalysts: Preparation and Electrocatalytic Performance on Ethanol Oxidation [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(4): 379-387. |
| [13] | SUN Shujuan, ZHENG Nannan, PAN Haokun, MA Meng, CHEN Jun, HUANG Xiubing. Research Progress on Preparation Methods of Single-atom Catalysts [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(2): 113-127. |
| [14] | LI Xueru, MA Zhejie, GUO Yujie, LI Ping. Influence of Support Characteristics on Coverage of Ionomer and Oxygen Reduction Performance for Pt/C Catalysts [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(12): 1395-1404. |
| [15] | ZHAO Lijuan, TAN Zhe, ZHANG Xiaoguang, JIANG Guosai, TAO Ran, PAN De’an. Numerical Simulation of Particle Classification for Spent Hydrogenation Catalyst [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(12): 1387-1394. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||