医用生物陶瓷的功能性生物适配机制及应用

doi:10.15541/jim20230244

无机材料学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 1-16.DOI: 10.15541/jim20230244 CSTR: 32189.14.10.15541/jim20230244

所属专题：【生物材料】骨骼与齿类组织修复(202409)

• 专题评述 • 下一篇

医用生物陶瓷的功能性生物适配机制及应用

郑嘉乾¹^,²(), 卢霄³^,⁴, 鲁亚杰³^,⁵, 王迎军¹^,², 王臻¹^,³^,⁵(), 卢建熙³^,⁴()

1.华南理工大学国家人体组织功能重建工程技术研究中心, 广州 510006
2.华南理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 广州 510641
3.上海骨科生物材料技术创新中心, 上海 201114
4.上海贝奥路生物材料有限公司, 上海 201114
5.中国人民解放军空军军医大学西京医院, 骨科, 西安 710032

收稿日期:2023-05-20 修回日期:2023-06-27 出版日期:2024-01-20 网络出版日期:2023-07-28
通讯作者: 王臻, 教授. E-mail: wangzhen@fmmu.edu.cn;
卢建熙, 教授. E-mail: lujianxi888@hotmail.com
作者简介:郑嘉乾(1994-), 男, 博士研究生. E-mail: mszjq2021@mail.scut.edu.cn

Functional Bioadaptability in Medical Bioceramics: Biological Mechanism and Application

ZHENG Jiaqian¹^,²(), LU Xiao³^,⁴, LU Yajie³^,⁵, WANG Yingjun¹^,², WANG Zhen¹^,³^,⁵(), LU Jianxi³^,⁴()

1. National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
3. Shanghai Orthopaedic Biotechnology Innovation Center, Shanghai 201114, China
4. Shanghai Bio-lu Biomaterials Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201114, China
5. Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China

Received:2023-05-20 Revised:2023-06-27 Published:2024-01-20 Online:2023-07-28
Contact: WANG Zhen, professor. E-mail: wangzhen@fmmu.edu.cn;
LU Jianxi, professor. E-mail: lujianxi888@hotmail.com
About author:ZHENG Jiaqian (1994-), male, PhD candidate. E-mail: mszjq2021@mail.scut.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFB3800800);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32000960);Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan(22S31906500)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了获得满意的临床疗效, 优质医用生物陶瓷应该具备怎样的性能一直困扰着广大研究者。自20世纪90年代以来, 作者团队致力于研发医用生物陶瓷, 从基础科学研究到成果转化, 再到临床应用, 积累了丰富的研究和应用经验, 相继提出了“生物适配”和“精准生物适配”理论。本文围绕“医用生物陶瓷(磷酸钙类材料)的功能性生物适配”这一主题分享本团队的学术研究成果和临床应用经验，从结构适配、降解适配、力学适配、应用适配等四个角度, 结合骨科临床应用背景, 探讨如何实现其生物适配和设计制造的有效衔接，旨在为医用生物陶瓷的设计、制造、监管和应用提供依据和建议。

关键词: 生物陶瓷, 生物适配, 材料微结构, 生物降解, 骨再生, 血管化, 专题评述

Abstract:

The question of what qualities excellent medical bioceramics must possess to ensure satisfactory prognosis for bone healing and reconstruction remains a topic of great interest in both clinical and biomaterial sciences. Our team has been dedicated to researching medical bioceramics since the 1990s, involving basic scientific research, applied translational research, and clinical trials. Consequently, we have amassed a wealth of research and implementation experience. In this article, we aim to explore the subject of “Functional Bioadaptability in Medical Bioceramics”, specifically focusing on calcium phosphate-based materials. We summarized how to effectively combine bioadaptability with design and manufacturing of medical bioceramics in the background of orthopedic clinical application, with the following aspects of structural adaptability, degradative adaptability, mechanical adaptability, and application adaptability. Hopefully, some suggestions put forward can ultimately provide valuable insights and recommendations for the design, production, supervision, and application of the upcoming medical bioceramics.

Key words: bioceramics, bioadaptability, material microstructure, biodegradation, osteo-regeneration, vascularization, perspective

中图分类号:

TQ174

郑嘉乾, 卢霄, 鲁亚杰, 王迎军, 王臻, 卢建熙. 医用生物陶瓷的功能性生物适配机制及应用[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(1): 1-16.

ZHENG Jiaqian, LU Xiao, LU Yajie, WANG Yingjun, WANG Zhen, LU Jianxi. Functional Bioadaptability in Medical Bioceramics: Biological Mechanism and Application[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 39(1): 1-16.

图/表 13

Fig. 1 Theory of “Cell-Material-Blood supply” interacting with trinity tissue regeneration[17]

Fig. 2 Effects of microstructure on cell recombination and proliferation[21,27] (a) Cell motility in bioceramic microstructure with three-dimensional flow dynamic culture system, perfusion bioreactor; (b) SEM images of the cross section of a scaffold seeded with sheep MSCs; (c) Histological section of the cell-TCP composite stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa (A-F)

Fig. 3 Different kinds of interconnective pore size β-TCP porous ceramics with the same macroporous size (300-400 μm) evaluated in vivo[31] (a-e) Interconnective pore size is 70, 100, 120, 150, and 200 μm, respectively; (f) The lumen of new blood vessels passing through the interconnection became narrower and larger after entering the hole, resembling a string-of-beads shape. Scale bars in all images are 100 μm

Fig. 4 Blood vessels growth curve guided by porous ceramic rod at different time[17]

Fig. 5 Effect of packing method on degradation[63] (a, d) Radiographs of cases with loose packing; (b, c) Radiographs of cases implanted with β-TCP granules by dense packing

Fig. 6 Mechanically enhanced bioceramics[72] (a) Structure of mechanically enhanced bioceramics; (b) Wedge- shaped implant for high tibial osteotomy (HTO); (c, d) Microstructures of the bioinspired β-TCP bioceramics showing the dense/porous interface (c), and macroporous structure (d)

Fig. 7 Clinical case of the bird’s nest-like frame structure implant

Fig. 8 Clinical case of long, hollow tubular frame structure implant

Fig. 9 Failure clinical case showing the implant broken due to stress concentration and insufficient support

Fig. 10 Bioceramics used in combination with chondrocytes to achieve better cartilage tissue repair[85] (a) Repaired with bioceramic-chondrocyte constructs implant, 2 w postsurgery; (b) Repaired with bioceramic-chondrocyte constructs implant, 24 w postsurgery; (c) Repaired with bioceramic without cells implant, 24 w postsurgery; (d) Defect without any implant (control), 24 w postsurgery

Fig. 11 Standard surgical procedure for ONFH treatment, performed with surgical ancillary instruments[44] (a) Insertion of the Kirschner wire under fluoroscopy; (b) Core decompression by drilling; (c) Necrosis debridement by minimal reamers; (d) Bioceramic granules packing; (e) Insertion of the porous bioceramic rods

Fig. 12 Van Gieson staining of “In Vivo Bioreactor” in rabbits showed the “Rebar Coagulated Bone” structure[102] Yellow arrow: Newly formed bone; White arrow: Connective. Scale bar: 50 μm (blue), 20 μm (green); Colorful figures are available on website

Fig. 13 Application of“In vivo Bioreactor” in operation[77] (a) Multi-material, structural, and technical bone defect repair solution; (b) Bioceramics granules being used; (c) Bioceramics microstructure; (d) Composite in operation

参考文献 102

[1]	LEMONS J E. Ceramics: past, present, and future. Bone, 1996,19(1 Suppl): 121S.
[2]	WILLIAMS D F. The plasticity of biocompatibility. Biomaterials, 2023, 296: 122077.
[3]	WILLIAMS D. Revisiting the definition of biocompatibility. Med. Device Technol., 2003, 14(8):10. PMID
[4]	WANG Y. Bioadaptability: an innovative concept for biomaterials. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2016, 32(9):801. DOI URL
[5]	XU X, JIA Z, ZHENG Y, et al. Bioadaptability of biomaterials: aiming at precision medicine. Matter, 2021, 4(8):2648. DOI URL
[6]	MASTROGIACOMO M, SCAGLIONE S, MARTINETTI R, et al. Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(17):3230. DOI URL
[7]	TUAN W H, CHEN Y C, HSU P Y, et al. Microstructure design for bone void filler. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 2022, 20(2):869. DOI URL
[8]	DIAO J, OUYANG J, DENG T, et al. 3D-plotted beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds with smaller pore sizes improve in vivo bone regeneration and biomechanical properties in a critical-sized calvarial defect rat model. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2018, 7(17):e1800441.
[9]	LI M, FU X, GAO H, et al. Regulation of an osteon-like concentric microgrooved surface on osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Biomaterials, 2019, 216: 119269.
[10]	XU D, WAN Y, LI Z, et al. Tailorable hierarchical structures of biomimetic hydroxyapatite micro/nano particles promoting endocytosis and osteogenic differentiation of stem cells. Biomater. Sci., 2020, 8(12):3286. DOI URL
[11]	WEI Y, GAO H, HAO L, et al. Constructing a Sr²⁺-substituted surface hydroxyapatite hexagon-like microarray on 3D-plotted hydroxyapatite scaffold to regulate osteogenic differentiation. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2020, 10(9):1672. DOI URL
[12]	LIU X, ZHAO N, LIANG H, et al. Bone tissue engineering scaffolds with HUVECs/hBMSCs cocultured on 3D-printed composite bioactive ceramic scaffolds promoted osteogenesis/ angiogenesis. J. Orthop. Translat., 2022, 37: 152.
[13]	LU Q, DIAO J, WANG Y, et al. 3D printed pore morphology mediates bone marrow stem cell behaviors via RhoA/ROCK2 signaling pathway for accelerating bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater., 2023, 26: 413.
[14]	DIAO J J, DING H W, HUANG M Q, et al. Bone defect model dependent optimal pore sizes of 3D-plotted beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. Small Methods, 2019, 3(11):11.
[15]	SONG C, LIU L, DENG Z, et al. Research progress on the design and performance of porous titanium alloy bone implants. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, 23: 2626.
[16]	LIN K, CHEN L, QU H, et al. Improvement of mechanical properties of macroporous β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic scaffolds with uniform and interconnected pore structures. Ceram. Int., 2011, 37(7):2397. DOI URL
[17]	LU J, WANG Z. Microstructure of bioceramics:biological effects and clinical application. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2020: 26.
[18]	MOHAMMADI H, SEPANTAFAR M, MUHAMAD N, et al. How does scaffold porosity conduct bone tissue regeneration. Adv. Eng. Mater., 2021, 23(10):2100463. DOI URL
[19]	LU J X, FLAUTRE B, ANSELME K, et al. Role of interconnections in porous bioceramics on bone recolonization in vitro and in vivo. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 1999, 10(2):111. DOI URL
[20]	CHA J M, HWANG Y S, KANG D K, et al. Development of a novel perfusion rotating wall vessel bioreactor with ultrasound stimulation for mass-production of mineralized tissue constructs. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2022, 19(4):739. DOI PMID
[21]	XIE Y, HARDOUIN P, ZHU Z, et al. Three-dimensional flow perfusion culture system for stem cell proliferation inside the critical-size beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold. Tissue Eng., 2006, 12(12):3535. PMID
[22]	XIE Y, ZHU Z, TANG T, et al. Using perfusion bioreactor for mesenchymal stem cell proliferation in large tricalcium phosphate scaffold. Chinese J. Orthop., 2006, 86(23):1633.
[23]	FORRESTAL D P, ALLENBY M C, SIMPSON B, et al. Personalized volumetric tissue generation by enhancing multiscale mass transport through 3D printed scaffolds in perfused bioreactors. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2022, 11(24):e2200454.
[24]	ENGEL N, FECHNER C, VOGES A, et al. An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications. Sci. Rep., 2021, 11(1):22228. DOI PMID
[25]	DING M, KOROMA K E, WENDT D, et al. Efficacy of bioreactor-activated bone substitute with bone marrow nuclear cells on fusion rate and fusion mass microarchitecture in sheep. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 2022, 110(8): 1862. DOI URL
[26]	KAZIMIERCZAK P, PRZEKORA A. Bioengineered living bone grafts: a concise review on bioreactors and production techniques in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2022, 23(3):1765. DOI URL
[27]	ZHANG Z, DU J, WEI Z, et al. Numerical simulation of dynamic seeding of mesenchymal stem cells in pore structure. Comput. & Mathemat. Appl., 2020, 79(1):88.
[28]	KUBOKI Y, JIN Q M, TAKITA H. Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis. Bone and Joint Surg.-Am., 2001, 83A: S105.
[29]	MAHAPATRA C, KUMAR P, PAUL M K, et al. Angiogenic stimulation strategies in bone tissue regeneration. Tissue Cell, 2022, 79: 101908.
[30]	GUERRERO J, MAEVSKAIA E, GHAYOR C, et al. Influence of scaffold microarchitecture on angiogenesis and regulation of cell differentiation during the early phase of bone healing: a transcriptomics and histological analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2023, 24(6):6000. DOI URL
[31]	BAI F, WANG Z, LU J, et al. The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. Tissue Eng. Part A, 2010, 16(12):3791. DOI URL
[32]	CHOI S W, ZHANG Y, MACEWAN M R, et al. Neovascularization in biodegradable inverse opal scaffolds with uniform and precisely controlled pore sizes. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2013, 2(1):145. DOI URL
[33]	SHEN M, LI Y, LU F, et al. Bioceramic scaffolds with triply periodic minimal surface architectures guide early-stage bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater., 2023, 25: 374.
[34]	LUTZWEILER G, NDREU HALILI A, ENGIN VRANA N. The overview of porous, bioactive scaffolds as instructive biomaterials for tissue regeneration and their clinical translation. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12(7):602. DOI URL
[35]	XIAO X, WANG W, LIU D, et al. The promotion of angiogenesis induced by three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with different interconnection sizes via activation of PI3K/Akt pathways. Sci. Rep., 2015, 5: 9409.
[36]	NAMKOONG S, LEE S J, KIM C K, et al. Prostaglandin E2 stimulates angiogenesis by activating the nitric oxide/cGMP pathway in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Exp. Mol. Med., 2005, 37(6):588. DOI PMID
[37]	DULAK J, JOZKOWICZ A. Nitric oxide and angiogenic activity of endothelial cells: direct or VEGF-dependent effect. Cardiovasc. Res., 2002, 56(3):489. DOI URL
[38]	LI J, HUANG H, XU T, et al. Effect of the interconnecting window diameter of hydroxyapatite scaffolds on vascularization and osteoinduction. Ceram. Int., 2022, 48(17):25070. DOI URL
[39]	LU Y J, WANG Z, LU X, et al. Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in ARCO stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ with bioceramic system. Chin. J. Repar. Reconst. Surgery, 2019, 33(10):1291.
[40]	MURAYAMA A, AJIKI T, HAYASHI Y, et al. A unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate promotes angiogenesis in a vascularized pedicle rat model. J. Orthop. Sci., 2019, 24(6):1118. DOI PMID
[41]	KUNISADA T, HASEI J, FUJIWARA T, et al. Radiographic and clinical assessment of unidirectional porous hydroxyapatite to treat benign bone tumors. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10: 21578.
[42]	KUMAGAI H, MAKIHARA T, FUNAYAMA T, et al. Angiogenesis and new bone formation in novel unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate: a histological study. J. Artif. Organs., 2019, 22(4):294. DOI PMID
[43]	IKUTA K, NISHIDA Y, OTA T, et al. A clinical trial of a unidirectional porous tricalcium phosphate filling for defects after resection of benign bone lesions: a prospective multicenter study. Sci. Rep., 2022, 12: 16060.
[44]	LU Y, LU X, LI M, et al. Minimally invasive treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with angioconductive bioceramic rod. Int. Orthop., 2018, 42(7):1567. DOI PMID
[45]	LU J, DESCAMPS M, DEJOU J, et al. The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2002, 63(4):408. DOI URL
[46]	ZHANG Y, SHU T, WANG S, et al. The osteoinductivity of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials: a tight interaction with bone healing. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2022, 10: 911180.
[47]	STASTNY P, SEDLACEK R, SUCHY T, et al. Structure degradation and strength changes of sintered calcium phosphate bone scaffolds with different phase structures during simulated biodegradation in vitro. Mater. Sci. Eng.: C, 2019, 100: 544.
[48]	CHAI Y C, CARLIER A, BOLANDER J, et al. Current views on calcium phosphate osteogenicity and the translation into effective bone regeneration strategies. Acta Biomater., 2012, 8(11):3876. DOI PMID
[49]	SANTOS C P G, PRADO J P S, FERNANDES K R, et al. Different species of marine sponges diverge in osteogenic potential when therapeutically applied as natural scaffolds for bone regeneration in rats. J. Funct. Biomater., 2023, 14(3):112. DOI URL
[50]	AVERIANOV I, STEPANOVA M, SOLOMAKHA O, et al. 3D-printed composite scaffolds based on poly(ε-caprolactone) filled with poly(glutamic acid)‐modified cellulose nanocrystals for improved bone tissue regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater., 2022, 110(11):2422. DOI URL
[51]	CHENG X, YANG X, LIU C, et al. Stabilization of apatite coatings on PPENK surfaces by mechanical interlocking to promote bioactivity and osseointegration in vivo. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf., 2023, 15(1):697. DOI URL
[52]	KUMAR R, PATTANAYAK I, DASH P A, et al. Bioceramics: a review on design concepts toward tailor-made (multi)-functional materials for tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Sci., 2023, 58(8):3460. DOI
[53]	TAJVAR S, HADJIZADEH A, SAMANDARI S S. Scaffold degradation in bone tissue engineering: an overview. Int. Biodeter. & Biodegr. 2023, 180:105599.
[54]	BOHNER M, SANTONI B L G, DOBELIN N. Beta-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: synthesis and properties. Acta Biomater., 2020, 113: 23.
[55]	LU J X, BLARY M C, VAVASSEUR S, et al. Relationship between bioceramics sintering and micro-particles-induced cellular damages. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2004, 15(4):361. DOI URL
[56]	SHEIKH Z, ABDALLAH M N, HANAFI A A, et al. Mechanisms of in vivo degradation and resorption of calcium phosphate based biomaterials. Materials (Basel), 2015, 8(11):7913. DOI URL
[57]	SIMON J L, ROY T D, PARSONS J R, et al. Engineered cellular response to scaffold architecture in a rabbit trephine defect. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2003, 66(2):275. PMID
[58]	LU J X, GALLUR A, FLAUTRE B, et al. Comparative study of tissue reactions to calcium phosphate ceramics among cancellous, cortical, and medullar bone sites in rabbits. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998, 42(3):357. DOI URL
[59]	GALOIS L, MAINARD D, DELAGOUTTE J P. Beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic as a bone substitute in orthopaedic surgery. Int. Orthop., 2002, 26(2):109. DOI PMID
[60]	WANG Z, LU B, CHEN L, et al. Evaluation of an osteostimulative putty in the sheep spine. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2011, 22(1):185. DOI URL
[61]	ZHI W, WANG X, SUN D, et al. Optimal regenerative repair of large segmental bone defect in a goat model with osteoinductive calcium phosphate bioceramic implants. Bioact. Mater., 2022, 11: 240.
[62]	HAMPP C, ANGRISANI N, REIFENRATH J, et al. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of two magnesium alloys as degradable implant materials in comparison to titanium as non-resorbable material in the rabbit. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 2013, 33(1):317. DOI URL
[63]	WANG Z, GUO Z, BAI H, et al. Clinical evaluation of beta-TCP in the treatment of lacunar bone defects: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 2013, 33(4): 1894. DOI URL
[64]	DEHOUX E, MADI K, FOURATI E, et al. High tibial open-wedge osteotomy using a tricalcium phosphate substitute: 70 cases with 18 months mean follow-up. Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice. Appar. Mot., 2005, 91(2):143. DOI URL
[65]	HERNIGOU P, ROUSSIGNOL X, FLOUZAT-LACHANIETTE C H, et al. Opening wedge tibial osteotomy for large varus deformity with ceraver resorbable beta-tricalcium phosphate wedges. Int. Orthop., 2010, 34(2):191. DOI URL
[66]	KRAAL T, MULLENDER M, DE BRUINE J H, et al. Resorbability of rigid beta-tricalcium phosphate wedges in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective radiological study. Knee, 2008, 15(3):201. DOI PMID
[67]	TANAKA T, KUMAGAE Y, SAITO M, et al. Bone formation and resorption in patients after implantation of beta-tricalcium phosphate blocks with 60% and 75% porosity in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 2008, 86(2):453.
[68]	OGOSE A, HOTTA T, KAWASHIMA H, et al. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 2005, 72(1):94.
[69]	HIRATA M, MURATA H, TAKESHITA H, et al. Use of purified beta-tricalcium phosphate for filling defects after curettage of benign bone tumours. Int. Orthop., 2006, 30(6):510. DOI PMID
[70]	JAVAHERI B, PITSILLIDES A A. Aging and mechanoadaptive responsiveness of bone. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep., 2019, 17(6):560. DOI PMID
[71]	ZHANG Y, ZHANG Q, HE F, et al. Fabrication of cancellous- bone-mimicking β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic scaffolds with tunable architecture and mechanical strength by stereolithography 3D printing. J. Europ. Ceram. Soci., 2022, 42(14):6713.
[72]	ZHANG F, CHANG J, LU J, et al. Bioinspired structure of bioceramics for bone regeneration in load-bearing sites. Acta Biomater., 2007, 3(6):896. DOI PMID
[73]	LIN KAILI, WANG XIAOHONG, STEVE G S, et al. Research progress on functional modifications and applications of bioceramic scaffolds. J. Inorg. Mater., 2020, 35(8):867. DOI
[74]	MIAO X, SUN D. Graded/gradient porous biomaterials. Materials, 2009, 3(1):26. DOI URL
[75]	HENDERSON E R, GROUNDLAND J S, PALA E, et al. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am., 2011, 93(5):418. DOI PMID
[76]	KENDAL J K, HAMAD C D, ABBOTT A G, et al. What are the indications and survivorship of tumor endoprosthetic reconstructions for patients with extremity metastatic bone disease. J. Surg. Oncol., 2023, 127(7):1196. DOI URL
[77]	LU Y, CHEN G, LONG Z, et al. Novel 3D-printed prosthetic composite for reconstruction of massive bone defects in lower extremities after malignant tumor resection. J. Bone Oncol., 2019, 16: 100220.
[78]	KELLY C N, WANG T, CROWLEY J, et al. High-strength, porous additively manufactured implants with optimized mechanical osseointegration. Biomaterials, 2021, 279: 121206.
[79]	HAIJIE L, DASEN L, TAO J, et al. Implant survival and complication profiles of endoprostheses for treating tumor around the knee in adults: a systematic review of the literature over the past 30 years. J. Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(4):1275. DOI PMID
[80]	VIJAYAVENKATARAMAN S, GOPINATH A, LU W F. A new design of 3D-printed orthopedic bone plates with auxetic structures to mitigate stress shielding and improve intra-operative bending. Bio-Design Manufact., 2020, 3(2):98. DOI
[81]	POBLOTH A M, CHECA S, RAZI H, et al. Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep. Sci. Transl. Med., 2018, 10(423):8828.
[82]	WU N, LI S, ZHANG B, et al. The advances of topology optimization techniques in orthopedic implants: a review. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 2021, 59(9):1673. DOI PMID
[83]	SAFAVI S, YU Y, ROBINSON D L, et al. Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review. J. Orthop. Surg. Res., 2023, 18(1):42. DOI PMID
[84]	YUAN J, WANG B, HAN C, et al. Nanosized-Ag-doped porous beta-tricalcium phosphate for biological applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 2020, 114: 111037.
[85]	YUAN J, WANG B, HAN C, et al. In vitro comparison of three rifampicin loading methods in a reinforced porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2015, 26(4):174. DOI URL
[86]	GUO X M, WANG C Y, DUAN C M, et al. Repair of osteochondral defects with autologous chondrocytes seeded onto bioceramic scaffold in sheep. Tissue Eng., 2004, 10(11/12): 1830. DOI PMID
[87]	GUO X M, WANG C Y, ZHANG Y F, et al. Repair of large articular cartilage defects with implants of autologous mesenchymal stem cells seeded into beta-tricalcium phosphate in a sheep model. Tissue Eng., 2004, 10(11/12): 1818. DOI URL
[88]	LI D, LI M, LIU P, et al. Tissue-engineered bone constructed in a bioreactor for repairing critical-sized bone defects in sheep. Int. Orthop., 2014, 38(11):2399. DOI PMID
[89]	SPONER P, KUCERA T, BRTKOVA J, et al. Comparative study on the application of mesenchymal stromal cells combined with tricalcium phosphate scaffold into femoral bone defects. Cell Transplant., 2018, 27(10):1459. DOI PMID
[90]	FATALE V, PAGNONI S, PAGNONI A E, et al. Histomorphometric comparison of new bone formed after maxillary sinus lift with lateral and crestal approaches using periostal mesenchymal stem cells and beta-tricalcium phosphate: a controlled clinical trial. J. Craniofac. Surg., 2022, 33(5):1607. DOI PMID
[91]	CHU W, WANG X, GAN Y, et al. Screen-enrich-combine circulating system to prepare MSC/beta-TCP for bone repair in fractures with depressed tibial plateau. Regen. Med., 2019, 14(6):555. DOI URL
[92]	BLANCO J F, VILLARON E M, PESCADOR D, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stromal cells embedded in tricalcium phosphate for posterolateral spinal fusion: results of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial with long-term follow-up. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 2019, 10(1):63. DOI PMID
[93]	LYU J, MA T, HUANG X, et al. Core decompression with β-tri-calcium phosphate grafts in combination with platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of avascular necrosis of femoral head. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 2023, 24(1):40. DOI
[94]	GAO Y, CHENG J, LONG Z, et al. Repair of segmental ulnar bone defect in juvenile caused by osteomyelitis with induced membrane combined with tissue-engineered bone:a case report with 4-year follow-up. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep., 2022, 99: 107569.
[95]	GUPTA S, MALHOTRA A, JINDAL R, et al. Role of beta tri-calcium phosphate-based composite ceramic as bone-graft expander in masquelet’s-induced membrane technique. Indian J. Orthop., 2019, 53(1):63. DOI
[96]	SASAKI G, WATANABE Y, MIYAMOTO W, et al. Induced membrane technique using beta-tricalcium phosphate for reconstruction of femoral and tibial segmental bone loss due to infection: technical tips and preliminary clinical results. Int. Orthop., 2018, 42(1):17. DOI PMID
[97]	RAVEN T F, MOGHADDAM A, ERMISCH C, et al. Use of Masquelet technique in treatment of septic and atrophic fracture nonunion. Injury, 2019, 50(Suppl 3):40. DOI URL
[98]	JUN F, ZHENG G, HONGBIN F, et al. Aplication of 3D-printed prosthesis on construction of long segmental bone defect after tumor resection. Chin. J. Orthop., 2017, 37(7):433.
[99]	HU X, KENAN S, CHENG M, et al. 3D-printed patient-customized artificial vertebral body for spinal reconstruction after total En Bloc spondylectomy of complex multi-level spinal tumors. Int. J. Bioprint., 2022, 8(3):576. DOI URL
[100]	BROWN T S, SALIB C G, ROSE P S, et al. Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review. Bone Joint J., 2018, 100-B(1 Supple A): 22.
[101]	THOMAS D, SINGH D. 3D-printing for engineering the next generation of artificial trabecular bone structures. Int. J. Surg., 2017, 46: 195.
[102]	GAO P, ZHANG H, LIU Y, et al. Beta-tricalcium phosphate granules improve osteogenesis in vitro and establish innovative osteo-regenerators for bone tissue engineering in vivo. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6: 23367.

医用生物陶瓷的功能性生物适配机制及应用

Functional Bioadaptability in Medical Bioceramics: Biological Mechanism and Application

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 102

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李雷, 程群峰. 高性能MXenes纳米复合材料研究进展[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 153-161.
[2]	徐向明, Husam N ALSHAREEF. MXetronics—MXene电子学[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 171-178.
[3]	李腊, 沈国震. 二维MXenes材料在柔性光电探测器中的应用展望[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 186-194.
[4]	巴坤, 王建禄, 韩美康. MXene的红外特性及其应用研究展望[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 162-170.
[5]	尹建宇, 刘逆霜, 高义华. MXene在压力传感中的研究进展[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 179-185.
[6]	刘艳艳, 谢曦, 刘增乾, 张哲峰. MAX相陶瓷增强金属基复合材料: 制备、性能与仿生设计[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 145-152.
[7]	邓顺桂, 张传芳. 多功能MXene油墨：面向印刷能源及电子器件的新视角[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 195-203.
[8]	陈泽, 支春义. MXene在锌离子电池中的应用: 研究进展与展望[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 204-214.
[9]	丁浩明, 陈科, 李勉, 李友兵, 柴之芳, 黄庆. 无机材料的“化学剪刀”结构编辑策略[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 115-128.
[10]	万胡杰, 肖旭. MXenes及其复合物的太赫兹电磁屏蔽与吸收[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 129-144.
[11]	费玲, 雷蕾, 汪德高. 二维MXene材料在新型薄膜太阳能电池技术中的研究进展[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(2): 215-224.
[12]	陈梦杰, 王倩倩, 吴成铁, 黄健. 基于DFT的描述符预测生物陶瓷的降解性[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(10): 1175-1181.
[13]	陶顺衍, 杨加胜, 邵芳, 吴应辰, 赵华玉, 董绍明, 张翔宇, 熊瑛. 航机CMC热端部件用热喷涂涂层的机遇与挑战[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(10): 1077-1083.
[14]	施哲, 刘伟业, 翟东, 谢建军, 朱钰方. 3D打印制备镁黄长石生物陶瓷骨组织工程支架及其性能[J]. 无机材料学报, 2023, 38(7): 763-770.
[15]	赵睿, 毛飞, 钱晖, 杨晓, 朱向东, 张兴栋. 微纳米结构生物材料在骨组织再生修复中的研究进展[J]. 无机材料学报, 2023, 38(7): 750-762.