无机材料学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 653-662.DOI: 10.15541/jim20250347 CSTR: 32189.14.10.15541/jim20250347
王雅娜1,2(
), 宋九鹏1, 王海润1, 李天山1, 焦健1(
)
收稿日期:2025-08-29
修回日期:2025-11-17
出版日期:2026-05-20
网络出版日期:2025-11-26
通讯作者:
焦 健, 研究员. E-mail: Jian.jiao@biam.ac.cn作者简介:王雅娜(1988-), 女, 博士. E-mail: wangyana198833@163.com
WANG Yana1,2(
), SONG Jiupeng1, WANG Hairun1, LI Tianshan1, JIAO Jian1(
)
Received:2025-08-29
Revised:2025-11-17
Published:2026-05-20
Online:2025-11-26
Contact:
JIAO Jian, professor. E-mail: Jian.jiao@biam.ac.cnAbout author:WANG Yana (1988-), female, PhD. E-mail: wangyana198833@163.com
摘要:
为满足航空发动机热端部件对熔渗(MI)工艺SiCf/SiC复合材料含孔结构的设计需求, 本研究制备了无孔试样以及五种孔径(D=1~9 mm)的开孔试样, 并开展室温拉伸实验。通过数字图像相关与声发射技术, 实时监测了全场应变与内部损伤, 系统揭示了孔径对损伤起始与演化的影响规律。通过建立三维有限元模型, 分析了材料非线性行为与孔边应力集中、孔-边缘应力干涉之间的竞争机制。研究结果表明, 开孔拉伸强度与孔径呈非线性关系: 当孔径D≤3 mm时, 强度随孔径增大而缓慢上升, 孔径D>3 mm时强度随孔径增大而迅速降低; 试样宽度与孔径之比(W/D)存在临界阈值, 当W/D<3时, 孔与边缘应力集中相互干涉, 导致承载能力急剧下降, 几何效应主导失效。损伤起始应力随孔径增大而降低, D≤3 mm的小孔试样损伤演化仍具顺序性, D>3 mm的大孔试样则表现为多种损伤模式并发。有限元分析进一步揭示, 材料进入非线性阶段后, 应力峰值会从孔边偏移, 使得孔径为1~2 mm的试样因孔边应力区与材料缺陷重合而早期失效。大孔径试样需更大应力重分布区, 当W/D超过临界值3时, 有效材料尺寸不足, 导致名义强度骤降。综上, MI-SiCf/SiC复合材料具备最优开孔拉伸性能的孔径为3 mm, 建议对W/D<3的开口结构采取补强措施。
中图分类号:
王雅娜, 宋九鹏, 王海润, 李天山, 焦健. MI-SiCf/SiC复合材料开孔拉伸性能孔径效应研究[J]. 无机材料学报, 2026, 41(5): 653-662.
WANG Yana, SONG Jiupeng, WANG Hairun, LI Tianshan, JIAO Jian. Hole Diameter Effect on Open-hole Tensile Mechanical Property of MI-SiCf/SiC Composites[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(5): 653-662.
图1 试验件构型、尺寸与试样加载图
Fig. 1 Test specimen configuration, dimensions and photograph of the loading setup (a) Open-hole tensile specimen; (b) Unnotched tensile specimen; (c) Photograph of the specimen under loading. Unit: mm
| Specimen | D/mm | W/D | Kt |
|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | / | / |
| K1 | 1 | 18 | 2.844 |
| K2 | 2 | 9 | 2.707 |
| K3 | 3 | 6 | 2.582 |
| K4 | 6 | 3 | 2.302 |
| K5 | 9 | 2 | 2.130 |
表1 试样几何构型和理论应力集中系数
Table 1 Specimen geometry and theoretical stress concentration factor
| Specimen | D/mm | W/D | Kt |
|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | / | / |
| K1 | 1 | 18 | 2.844 |
| K2 | 2 | 9 | 2.707 |
| K3 | 3 | 6 | 2.582 |
| K4 | 6 | 3 | 2.302 |
| K5 | 9 | 2 | 2.130 |
图3 无孔与开孔试样的拉伸曲线和断口形貌对比
Fig. 3 Comparison of tensile curves and fracture surface morphologies between unnotched and open-hole specimens (a) Nominal open-hole tensile stress-strain curves; (b) Net-section stress-strain curves; (c) Fracture morphologies of OHT specimens
| Specimen | D/ mm | EOHT/ GPa | ENS/ GPa | SOHT/ MPa | SNS/ MPa | σp_OHT/ MPa | σp_NS/ MPa | σpeak/ MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | 206 | 206 | 228 | 228 | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| K1 | 1 | 200 | 212 | 155 | 164 | 106 | 112 | 301 |
| K2 | 2 | 203 | 229 | 158 | 177 | 98.8 | 111 | 267 |
| K3 | 3 | 204 | 245 | 162 | 194 | 98.1 | 117 | 253 |
| K4 | 6 | 186 | 278 | 120 | 179 | 90.0 | 134 | 207 |
| K5 | 9 | 83.2 | 164 | 47.3 | 93.1 | 20.5 | 40.5 | 43.7 |
表2 不同孔径试样的拉伸刚度和强度
Table 2 Tensile stiffness and strength for specimens with different hole diameters
| Specimen | D/ mm | EOHT/ GPa | ENS/ GPa | SOHT/ MPa | SNS/ MPa | σp_OHT/ MPa | σp_NS/ MPa | σpeak/ MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | 206 | 206 | 228 | 228 | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| K1 | 1 | 200 | 212 | 155 | 164 | 106 | 112 | 301 |
| K2 | 2 | 203 | 229 | 158 | 177 | 98.8 | 111 | 267 |
| K3 | 3 | 204 | 245 | 162 | 194 | 98.1 | 117 | 253 |
| K4 | 6 | 186 | 278 | 120 | 179 | 90.0 | 134 | 207 |
| K5 | 9 | 83.2 | 164 | 47.3 | 93.1 | 20.5 | 40.5 | 43.7 |
图7 K1~K5试样孔边应力预测结果
Fig. 7 Stress predictions around holes in K1-K5 specimens (a) Elastic model results; (b) Nonlinear model results; (c) Stress distribution along hole edge to the specimen edge line
| Specimen | D/mm | Le/mm | Lp/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 1 | 0.159 | 0.225 |
| K2 | 2 | 0.337 | 0.505 |
| K3 | 3 | 0.559 | 0.781 |
| K4 | 6 | 0.584 | / |
| K5 | 9 | / | / |
表3 不同孔径试样的特征尺寸分析结果
Table 3 Characteristic dimension analysis for specimens with different hole diameters
| Specimen | D/mm | Le/mm | Lp/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 1 | 0.159 | 0.225 |
| K2 | 2 | 0.337 | 0.505 |
| K3 | 3 | 0.559 | 0.781 |
| K4 | 6 | 0.584 | / |
| K5 | 9 | / | / |
图S1 不同孔径下的试验件内部缺陷的CT重构图像
Fig. S1 CT reconstructed images of internal defects in specimens with different hole diameters (a) K1 specimen; (b) K2 specimen; (c) K3 specimen; (d) K4 specimen; (e) K5 specimen
图S7 孔边到试样边缘连线上的应变分布
Fig. S7 Longitudinal tensile strain distribution along the hole-to-side line (a) K1 specimen; (b) K2 specimen; (c) K3 specimen; (d) K4 specimen; (e) K5 specimen
| σOHT/MPa | 46 | 82 | 113 | 138 | 149 | 155 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| K2 | σOHT/MPa | 23.5 | 84.0 | 112 | 144 | 155 | 158 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K3 | σOHT/MPa | 34.1 | 78.0 | 108 | 142 | 155 | 162 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K4 | σOHT/MPa | 29.1 | 43.0 | 85.2 | 107 | 120 | 103 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K5 | σOHT/MPa | 15.1 | 28.0 | 36.1 | 47.2 | 46.0 | 37.1 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
表S1 5种不同孔径试样不同应力水平下表面应变场的整体变化规律
Table S1 Variation of the full-field surface strain at different stress levels for specimens with five different hole diameters
| σOHT/MPa | 46 | 82 | 113 | 138 | 149 | 155 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| K2 | σOHT/MPa | 23.5 | 84.0 | 112 | 144 | 155 | 158 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K3 | σOHT/MPa | 34.1 | 78.0 | 108 | 142 | 155 | 162 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K4 | σOHT/MPa | 29.1 | 43.0 | 85.2 | 107 | 120 | 103 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K5 | σOHT/MPa | 15.1 | 28.0 | 36.1 | 47.2 | 46.0 | 37.1 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Specimen | First occurrence of acoustic emission signals on the peak frequency curve | First occurrence of an energy jump on the normalized cumulative energy curve | Peak frequency reaches the first peak point |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() σOHT=32.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=52.7 MPa | ![]() σOHT=102 MPa |
| K2 | ![]() σOHT=23.1 MPa | ![]() σOHT=37.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=121 MPa |
| K3 | ![]() σOHT=27.0 MPa | ![]() σOHT=36.6 MPa | σOHT=104 MPa |
| K4 | ![]() σOHT=16.9 MPa | ![]() σOHT=29.5 MPa | ![]() σOHT=44.1 MPa |
| K5 | ![]() σOHT=14.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=16.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=47.4 MPa |
表S2 声发射信号特征点应力下的DIC应变云图
Table S2 DIC strain contour map of the stress corresponding to acoustic emission signal feature points
| Specimen | First occurrence of acoustic emission signals on the peak frequency curve | First occurrence of an energy jump on the normalized cumulative energy curve | Peak frequency reaches the first peak point |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() σOHT=32.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=52.7 MPa | ![]() σOHT=102 MPa |
| K2 | ![]() σOHT=23.1 MPa | ![]() σOHT=37.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=121 MPa |
| K3 | ![]() σOHT=27.0 MPa | ![]() σOHT=36.6 MPa | σOHT=104 MPa |
| K4 | ![]() σOHT=16.9 MPa | ![]() σOHT=29.5 MPa | ![]() σOHT=44.1 MPa |
| K5 | ![]() σOHT=14.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=16.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=47.4 MPa |
| [1] | 李龙彪. 陶瓷基复合材料在航空发动机应用与适航符合性验证研究进展. 复合材料学报, 2025, 42(1): 54. |
| [2] | 焦健, 孙世杰, 焦春荣, 等. SiCf/SiC复合材料涡轮导向叶片研究进展. 复合材料学报, 2023, 40(8): 4342. |
| [3] |
王雅娜, 李天山, 王海润, 等. GE公司预浸料-熔渗工艺SiCf/SiC复合材料应用研究历程及启示. 航空材料学报, 2025, 45(2): 1.
DOI |
| [4] | 刘虎, 束小文, 洪智亮, 等. 航空发动机用SiC/SiC复合材料典型元件设计及性能评价研究进展. 材料导报, 2023, 37(14): 12. |
| [5] | ASTM International. Standard test method for open-hole tensile strength of fiber-reinforced advanced ceramic composites: ASTM C1869-18. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2023. |
| [6] | KALLURI S, VERRILLI M J. Influence of holes on the in-plane tensile strength and fatigue durability of a Nicalon™/Si-N-C ceramic matrix composite. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, 2003, 24(4): 427. |
| [7] |
HAQUE A, AHMED L, RAMASETTY A. Stress concentrations and notch sensitivity in woven ceramic matrix composites containing a circular hole—an experimental, analytical, and finite element study. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2005, 88(8): 2195.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
GYEKENYESI A L, MORSCHER G N. Damage progression and stress redistribution in notched SiC/SiC composites. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2010, 19(9): 1298.
DOI URL |
| [9] | GYEKENYESI A L, MORSCHER G N. Evaluating the mechanical behavior of notched SiC/SiC composites using thermoelastic stress analysis. Proceedings of SPIE, Bellingham, 2004: 456-465. |
| [10] | MORSCHER G N, GYEKENYESI J Z, GYEKENYESI A L. Mechanical behavior of notched SiC/SiC composites. ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress, New Orleans, 2001: 1-7. |
| [11] |
RUGGLES-WRENN M B, KURTZ G. Notch sensitivity of fatigue behavior of a Hi-Nicalon™/SiC-B4C composite at 1,200 ℃ in air and in steam. Applied Composite Materials, 2013, 20: 891.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
GOWAYED Y, OJARD G, CHEN J, et al. Accumulation of time-dependent strain during dwell-fatigue experiments of iBN- Sylramic melt infiltrated SiC/SiC composites with and without holes. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2011, 42(12): 2020.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
MCNULTY J C, HE M Y, ZOK F W. Notch sensitivity of fatigue life in a Sylramic™/SiC composite at elevated temperature. Composites Science and Technology, 2001, 61(9): 1331.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
SANTHOSH U, AHMAD J, JOHN R, et al. Modeling of stress concentration in ceramic matrix composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 45: 1156.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
GUAN X Y, WANG Y N, JIAO J, et al. Hierarchical modeling of strain-concentrating effect in notched ceramic-matrix composite laminates. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2025, 304: 110641.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
LIU H, LI L B, WANG Y N, et al. In situ damage propagation and fracture in notched cross-ply SiC/SiC composites: experiment and numerical modeling. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2024, 44(4): 2052.
DOI URL |
| [17] | 刘海龙. SiC/SiC陶瓷基复合材料力学性能与失效机理研究. 上海: 上海交通大学硕士学位论文, 2020. |
| [18] | PETERSON R E, PLUNKETT R. Stress concentration factors. Naval Engineers Journal, 2010, 67(3): 697. |
| [19] |
MORSCHER G N. Stress-dependent matrix cracking in 2D woven SiC-fiber reinforced melt-infiltrated SiC matrix composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2004, 64(9): 1311.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
MORSCHER G N, MAXWELL R. Monitoring tensile fatigue crack growth and fiber failure around a notch in laminate SiC/SiC composites utilizing acoustic emission, electrical resistance, and digital image correlation. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2019, 39(2/3): 229.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
BACHE M R, NEWTON C D, JONES J P, et al. Advances in damage monitoring techniques for the detection of failure in SiCf/SiC ceramic matrix composites. Ceramics, 2019, 2(2): 347.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
DASSIOS K G, AGGELIS D G, KORDATOS E Z, et al. Cyclic loading of a SiC-fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composite reveals damage mechanisms and thermal residual stress state. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2013, 44: 105.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
MORSCHER G N, FERGUSON C, PRATT S, et al. Acoustic emission accuracy from a tensile test of a ceramic matrix composite. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2024, 107(12): 8556.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 陈斌, 任科, 王一光. Mini-SiCf/SiC复合材料长时间高温下的力学性能演变[J]. 无机材料学报, 2025, 40(9): 971-980. |
| [2] | 吴晓晨, 郑瑞晓, 李露, 马浩林, 赵培航, 马朝利. SiCf/SiC陶瓷基复合材料高温环境损伤原位监测研究进展[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(6): 609-622. |
| [3] | 李广宇, 岳一凡, 王波, 张程煜, 索涛, 李玉龙. 2D-SiC/SiC复合材料的弹丸冲击损伤及冲击后拉伸性能[J]. 无机材料学报, 2024, 39(5): 494-500. |
| [4] | 沈轩逸, 马沁, 薛玉冬, 廖春景, 朱敏, 张翔宇, 杨金山, 董绍明. 复合界面层对SiCf/SiC复合材料力学损伤行为的影响[J]. 无机材料学报, 2023, 38(8): 917-922. |
| [5] | 张亚晨, 孟佳, 蔡坤, 盛晓晨, 乐军, 宋力昕. 基于声发射技术的Si-Cr-Ti高温抗氧化涂层弯曲失效机理研究[J]. 无机材料学报, 2021, 36(11): 1185-1192. |
| [6] | 李陇彬, 薛玉冬, 胡建宝, 杨金山, 张翔宇, 董绍明. 碳化硅纳米线增韧碳化硅纤维/碳化硅基体损伤行为研究[J]. 无机材料学报, 2021, 36(10): 1111-1117. |
| [7] | 张勇祯, 童小燕, 姚磊江, 李斌, 白国栋. 基于改进遗传算法的C/SiC拉伸损伤声发射模式识别[J]. 无机材料学报, 2020, 35(5): 593-600. |
| [8] | 黄喜鹏, 王波, 杨成鹏, 潘文革, 刘小瀛. 基于声发射信号的三维针刺C/SiC复合材料拉伸损伤演化研究[J]. 无机材料学报, 2018, 33(6): 609-616. |
| [9] | 邓启煌, 王连军, 许虹杰, 王宏志, 江 莞. MSP试验法评价PZT陶瓷的循环疲劳寿命[J]. 无机材料学报, 2012, 27(10): 1047-1052. |
| [10] | 潘文革,矫桂琼,王波,管国阳. 声发射技术在三维编织C/SiC复合材料拉伸损伤分析中的应用[J]. 无机材料学报, 2004, 19(4): 871-875. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||