Graphene Quantum Dots/CdS/CdSe Co-Sensitized Solar Cells

doi:10.15541/jim20160698

Abstract

Abstract:

Using three-dimensional anatase TiO₂ microspheres as light scattering overlayer and commercial TiO₂nanocrystalline as connecting underlayer, novel double-layered TiO₂ films were prepared by a doctor blade method for quantum dots sensitized solar cell (QDSSC) application. The graphene quantum dots (GQDs) were introduced by dripping, and the CdS/CdSe quantum dots were deposited by continuous ion-layer adsorption (SILAR) method, respectively. The prepared quantum dots sensitized thin films were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron miscroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Uv-vis diffuse reflectance spectra, and fluorescence spectra. CdS/CdSe quantum dots sensitized and GQDs/CdS/CdSe co-sensitized solar cells were fabricated, respectively. And the effects of GQDs and CdS quantum dots with different deposition cycles on the microstructures and the photovoltaic performance of the double-layered TiO₂QDSSCs were investigated and discussed. The results revealed that the introduced GQDs and the CdS deposition cycle obviously influenced the optical properties of the double-layered TiO₂ film. The electron transfer and charge-recombination process are also affected by the CdS deposition cycle and the introduced GQDs. Optimally, the conversion efficiency and photocurrent density of the TiO₂/QGDs/CdS(4)/CdSe solar cell is 1.24% and 9.47 mA/cm², respectively, which are higher than those (0.59% and 6.22 mA/cm², respectively) of the TiO₂/CdS(4)/CdSe cell. This is due to the effective electrons transport and reduced charge recombination within the co-sensitized cell.

Key words: graphene quantum dots (GQDs), CdS/CdSe quantum dots, TiO₂ microspheres, co-sensitized solar cells

CLC Number:

O643

LIU Yong-Qiang, HUANG Hao, ZHAI Jin-Sheng, MA Meng-Jun, FAN Jia-Jie. Graphene Quantum Dots/CdS/CdSe Co-Sensitized Solar Cells[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2017, 32(10): 1042-1048.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1 SEM images of TiO2 microspheres (a), surface (b), cross-section (c), and EDX pattern (d) of TiO2 film sensitized by CdS/CdSe QDs in (c)

Fig. 2 TEM images of TiO2 microspheres before (a) and after (b) being CdS/CdSe co-sensitized, and HRTEM image of QDs deposited on TiO2 film (c)

Fig. 3 XRD patterns of FTO substrate (a), FTO/TiO2 (b), and FTO/TiO2/CdS(4)/CdSe (c) films

Fig. 4 UV-Vis absorption spectra of TiO2 films sensitized by various QDs

Fig. 5 Band gap diagram of TiO2 before and after quantum dot sensitization

Fig. 6 PL spectra of TiO2 films sensitized by various GQDs

Fig. 7 PL spectra of TiO2 films sensitized by various QDs

Fig. 8 Comparison of the I-V characteristics of QDSSCs made from TiO2 photoanodes sensitized by various QDs

Table 1 Comparison of the I-V characteristics of QDSSCs made from TiO2 photoanodes sensitized by various QDs

Samples	η /%	V_OC/V	FF	J_SC/(mA·cm^-2)
TiO₂/CdS(2)/CdSe	0.39	0.283	0.347	4.00
TiO₂/CdS(4)/CdSe	0.59	0.297	0.320	6.22
TiO₂/CdS(6)/CdSe	0.62	0.341	0.371	4.90
TiO₂/QGDs/CdS(2)/CdSe	0.61	0.316	0.342	5.62
TiO₂/QGDs/CdS(4)/CdSe	1.24	0.374	0.342	9.47
TiO₂/QGDs/CdS(6)/CdSe	1.05	0.395	0.324	8.23

Fig. 9 IPCE spectra of QDSSCs prepared with various QDs-sensitized TiO2 photoanodes

Fig. 10 EIS spectra of QDSSCs prepared with various QDs-sensitized TiO2 photoanodes

References 13

[1]	LEE Y L, LO Y S.Highly efficiency quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell based on co-sensitization of CdS/CdSe.Advances Materials, 2009, 19(4): 604-609.
[2]	LUO S P, SHEN H, HU W, et al.Improved charge separation and transport efficiency in panchromatic-sensitized solar cells with co-sensitization of PbS/CdS/ZnS quantum dots and dye molecules.RSC Advances, 2016, 6(25): 21156-21164.
[3]	PAN Z X, ZHANG H, CHENG K, et al.Highly efficient inverted type-I CdS/CdSe core/shell structure QD-sensitized solar cells. ACS nano, 2012, 6(5): 3982-3991.
[4]	YU J G, FAN J J, LV K L.Anatase TiO2 nanosheets with exposed (001) facets: improved photoelectric conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells.Nanoscale, 2010, 2(10): 2144-2149.
[5]	ZHAO L, YU J G, FAN J J.Dye-sensitized solar cells based on ordered titanate nanorod films fabricated by electrophoretic deposition method.Electrochemistry Communications, 2009, 11(10): 2052-2055.
[6]	YU J G, FAN J J, CHENG B.Dye-sensitized solar cells based on anatase TiO2 hollow spheres/carbon nanorod composite films.Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(18): 7891-7898.
[7]	DING Y, Ma Y M, TAO L, et al.TiO2 nanocrystalline layer as a bridge linking TiO2 sub-microspheres layer and substrates for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells.Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 272(7): 1046-1052.
[8]	SOMMELIGN P M, O'REGAN B C, HASWELL R R, et al. Influence of a TiCl4 post-treatment on nanocrystalline TiO2 films in dye-sensitized solar cells.Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(39): 19191-19197.
[9]	CHENG P F, DU S S, CAI Y X, et al.Tripartite layered photoanode from hierarchical anatase TiO2 urchin-like spheres and P25: a candidate for enhanced efficiency dye sensitized solar cells.Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(46): 24150-24156.
[10]	YU J G, FAN J J, ZHAO L.Dye-sensitized solar cells based on hollow anatase TiO2 spheres prepared by self-transformation method.Electrochimica Acta, 2010, 55(3): 597-602.
[11]	FAN J J, LIU S W, YU J G.Enhanced photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells based on TiO2 nanosheets/graphene composite films.Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22(33): 17027-17036.
[12]	ZHU G, PAN L K, XU T, et al.CdS/CdSe-cosensitized TiO2 photoanode for quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells by a microwave-assisted chemical bath deposition method.ACS Applied Materials, 2011, 3(8): 3146-3151.
[13]	ZHAO L, FAN J J, LI J, et al.Preparation and photoelectric properties of ZnO/TiO2 nanotubes film electrodes.Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2012, 27(6): 585-590.

[1]	LI Jiaqi, LI Xiaosong, LI Xuanhe, ZHU Xiaobing, ZHU Aimin. Transition Metal-doped Manganese Oxide: Synthesis by Warm Plasma and Electrocatalytic Performance for Oxygen Evolution Reaction [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 39(7): 835-844.
[2]	YANG Bo, LÜ Gongxuan, MA Jiantai. Electrocatalytic Water Splitting over Nickel Iron Hydroxide-cobalt Phosphide Composite Electrode [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 39(4): 374-382.
[3]	YE Maosen, WANG Yao, XU Bing, WANG Kangkang, ZHANG Shengnan, FENG Jianqing. II/Z-type Bi₂MoO₆/Ag₂O/Bi₂O₃ Heterojunction for Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline under Visible Light Irradiation [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 39(3): 321-329.
[4]	SUN Chen, ZHAO Kunfeng, YI Zhiguo. Research Progress in Catalytic Total Oxidation of Methane [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(11): 1245-1256.
[5]	LI Yuejun, CAO Tieping, SUN Dawei. Bi₄O₅Br₂/CeO₂ Composite with S-scheme Heterojunction: Construction and CO₂ Reduction Performance [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(8): 963-970.
[6]	WANG Mengtao, SUO Jun, FANG Dong, YI Jianhong, LIU Yichun, Olim RUZIMURADOV. Visible-light Catalytic Performance of ITO/TiO₂ Nanotube Array Composite [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(11): 1292-1300.
[7]	MA Xinquan, LI Xibao, CHEN Zhi, FENG Zhijun, HUANG Juntong. BiOBr/ZnMoO₄ Step-scheme Heterojunction: Construction and Photocatalytic Degradation Properties [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(1): 62-70.
[8]	TUERHONG Munire, ZHAO Honggang, MA Yuhua, QI Xianhui, LI Yuchen, YAN Chenxiang, LI Jiawen, CHEN Ping. Construction and Photocatalytic Activity of Monoclinic Tungsten Oxide/Red Phosphorus Step-scheme Heterojunction [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(6): 701-707.
[9]	GAN Hongyu, FENG Yan, YANG Dehong, TIAN Yubin, LI Yang, XING Tao, LI Zhi, ZHAO Xuebo, DAI Pengcheng. Heteroatom-doped Biochar for Direct Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propylene [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(10): 1058-1064.
[10]	LIU Xuechen, ZENG Di, ZHOU Yuanyi, WANG Haipeng, ZHANG Ling, WANG Wenzhong. Selective Oxidation of Biomass over Modified Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(1): 38-44.
[11]	CHEN Xiaomei, CHEN Ying, YUAN Xia. Decomposition of Cyclohexyl Hydroperoxide Catalyzed by Core-shell Material Co₃O₄@SiO₂ [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(1): 65-71.
[12]	LI Tie, LI Yue, WANG Yingyi, ZHANG Ting. Preparation and Catalytic Properties of Graphene-Bismuth Ferrite Nanocrystal Nanocomposite [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(7): 725-732.
[13]	FAN Jun, JIANG Xue, JIAO Yi, CHEN Yusheng, WANG Jianli, CHEN Yaoqiang. Effect of Different Alkali-assisted Deposition Precipitation Methods on the Durability of Three-way Catalysts [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(6): 659-664.
[14]	AN Weijia, LI Jing, WANG Shuyao, HU Jinshan, LIN Zaiyuan, CUI Wenquan, LIU Li, XIE Jun, LIANG Yinghua. Fe(III)/rGO/Bi₂MoO₆ Composite Photocatalyst Preparation and Phenol Degradation by Photocatalytic Fenton Synergy [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(6): 615-622.
[15]	XIAO Xiang, GUO Shaoke, DING Cheng, ZHANG Zhijie, HUANG Hairui, XU Jiayue. CsPbBr₃@TiO₂ Core-shell Structure Nanocomposite as Water Stable and Efficient Visible-light-driven Photocatalyst [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(5): 507-512.