Journal of Inorganic Materials ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 653-662.DOI: 10.15541/jim20250347
• DATA PAPER • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Yana1,2(
), SONG Jiupeng1, WANG Hairun1, LI Tianshan1, JIAO Jian1(
)
Received:2025-08-29
Revised:2025-11-17
Published:2026-05-20
Online:2025-11-26
Contact:
JIAO Jian, professor. E-mail: Jian.jiao@biam.ac.cnAbout author:WANG Yana (1988-), female, PhD. E-mail: wangyana198833@163.com
CLC Number:
WANG Yana, SONG Jiupeng, WANG Hairun, LI Tianshan, JIAO Jian. Hole Diameter Effect on Open-hole Tensile Mechanical Property of MI-SiCf/SiC Composites[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2026, 41(5): 653-662.
Fig. 1 Test specimen configuration, dimensions and photograph of the loading setup (a) Open-hole tensile specimen; (b) Unnotched tensile specimen; (c) Photograph of the specimen under loading. Unit: mm
| Specimen | D/mm | W/D | Kt |
|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | / | / |
| K1 | 1 | 18 | 2.844 |
| K2 | 2 | 9 | 2.707 |
| K3 | 3 | 6 | 2.582 |
| K4 | 6 | 3 | 2.302 |
| K5 | 9 | 2 | 2.130 |
Table 1 Specimen geometry and theoretical stress concentration factor
| Specimen | D/mm | W/D | Kt |
|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | / | / |
| K1 | 1 | 18 | 2.844 |
| K2 | 2 | 9 | 2.707 |
| K3 | 3 | 6 | 2.582 |
| K4 | 6 | 3 | 2.302 |
| K5 | 9 | 2 | 2.130 |
Fig. 3 Comparison of tensile curves and fracture surface morphologies between unnotched and open-hole specimens (a) Nominal open-hole tensile stress-strain curves; (b) Net-section stress-strain curves; (c) Fracture morphologies of OHT specimens
| Specimen | D/ mm | EOHT/ GPa | ENS/ GPa | SOHT/ MPa | SNS/ MPa | σp_OHT/ MPa | σp_NS/ MPa | σpeak/ MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | 206 | 206 | 228 | 228 | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| K1 | 1 | 200 | 212 | 155 | 164 | 106 | 112 | 301 |
| K2 | 2 | 203 | 229 | 158 | 177 | 98.8 | 111 | 267 |
| K3 | 3 | 204 | 245 | 162 | 194 | 98.1 | 117 | 253 |
| K4 | 6 | 186 | 278 | 120 | 179 | 90.0 | 134 | 207 |
| K5 | 9 | 83.2 | 164 | 47.3 | 93.1 | 20.5 | 40.5 | 43.7 |
Table 2 Tensile stiffness and strength for specimens with different hole diameters
| Specimen | D/ mm | EOHT/ GPa | ENS/ GPa | SOHT/ MPa | SNS/ MPa | σp_OHT/ MPa | σp_NS/ MPa | σpeak/ MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0 | 0 | 206 | 206 | 228 | 228 | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| K1 | 1 | 200 | 212 | 155 | 164 | 106 | 112 | 301 |
| K2 | 2 | 203 | 229 | 158 | 177 | 98.8 | 111 | 267 |
| K3 | 3 | 204 | 245 | 162 | 194 | 98.1 | 117 | 253 |
| K4 | 6 | 186 | 278 | 120 | 179 | 90.0 | 134 | 207 |
| K5 | 9 | 83.2 | 164 | 47.3 | 93.1 | 20.5 | 40.5 | 43.7 |
Fig. 7 Stress predictions around holes in K1-K5 specimens (a) Elastic model results; (b) Nonlinear model results; (c) Stress distribution along hole edge to the specimen edge line
| Specimen | D/mm | Le/mm | Lp/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 1 | 0.159 | 0.225 |
| K2 | 2 | 0.337 | 0.505 |
| K3 | 3 | 0.559 | 0.781 |
| K4 | 6 | 0.584 | / |
| K5 | 9 | / | / |
Table 3 Characteristic dimension analysis for specimens with different hole diameters
| Specimen | D/mm | Le/mm | Lp/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | 1 | 0.159 | 0.225 |
| K2 | 2 | 0.337 | 0.505 |
| K3 | 3 | 0.559 | 0.781 |
| K4 | 6 | 0.584 | / |
| K5 | 9 | / | / |
Fig. S1 CT reconstructed images of internal defects in specimens with different hole diameters (a) K1 specimen; (b) K2 specimen; (c) K3 specimen; (d) K4 specimen; (e) K5 specimen
Fig. S7 Longitudinal tensile strain distribution along the hole-to-side line (a) K1 specimen; (b) K2 specimen; (c) K3 specimen; (d) K4 specimen; (e) K5 specimen
| σOHT/MPa | 46 | 82 | 113 | 138 | 149 | 155 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| K2 | σOHT/MPa | 23.5 | 84.0 | 112 | 144 | 155 | 158 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K3 | σOHT/MPa | 34.1 | 78.0 | 108 | 142 | 155 | 162 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K4 | σOHT/MPa | 29.1 | 43.0 | 85.2 | 107 | 120 | 103 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K5 | σOHT/MPa | 15.1 | 28.0 | 36.1 | 47.2 | 46.0 | 37.1 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Table S1 Variation of the full-field surface strain at different stress levels for specimens with five different hole diameters
| σOHT/MPa | 46 | 82 | 113 | 138 | 149 | 155 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| K2 | σOHT/MPa | 23.5 | 84.0 | 112 | 144 | 155 | 158 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K3 | σOHT/MPa | 34.1 | 78.0 | 108 | 142 | 155 | 162 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K4 | σOHT/MPa | 29.1 | 43.0 | 85.2 | 107 | 120 | 103 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| K5 | σOHT/MPa | 15.1 | 28.0 | 36.1 | 47.2 | 46.0 | 37.1 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Specimen | First occurrence of acoustic emission signals on the peak frequency curve | First occurrence of an energy jump on the normalized cumulative energy curve | Peak frequency reaches the first peak point |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() σOHT=32.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=52.7 MPa | ![]() σOHT=102 MPa |
| K2 | ![]() σOHT=23.1 MPa | ![]() σOHT=37.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=121 MPa |
| K3 | ![]() σOHT=27.0 MPa | ![]() σOHT=36.6 MPa | σOHT=104 MPa |
| K4 | ![]() σOHT=16.9 MPa | ![]() σOHT=29.5 MPa | ![]() σOHT=44.1 MPa |
| K5 | ![]() σOHT=14.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=16.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=47.4 MPa |
Table S2 DIC strain contour map of the stress corresponding to acoustic emission signal feature points
| Specimen | First occurrence of acoustic emission signals on the peak frequency curve | First occurrence of an energy jump on the normalized cumulative energy curve | Peak frequency reaches the first peak point |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1 | ![]() σOHT=32.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=52.7 MPa | ![]() σOHT=102 MPa |
| K2 | ![]() σOHT=23.1 MPa | ![]() σOHT=37.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=121 MPa |
| K3 | ![]() σOHT=27.0 MPa | ![]() σOHT=36.6 MPa | σOHT=104 MPa |
| K4 | ![]() σOHT=16.9 MPa | ![]() σOHT=29.5 MPa | ![]() σOHT=44.1 MPa |
| K5 | ![]() σOHT=14.4 MPa | ![]() σOHT=16.2 MPa | ![]() σOHT=47.4 MPa |
| [1] | 李龙彪. 陶瓷基复合材料在航空发动机应用与适航符合性验证研究进展. 复合材料学报, 2025, 42(1): 54. |
| [2] | 焦健, 孙世杰, 焦春荣, 等. SiCf/SiC复合材料涡轮导向叶片研究进展. 复合材料学报, 2023, 40(8): 4342. |
| [3] |
王雅娜, 李天山, 王海润, 等. GE公司预浸料-熔渗工艺SiCf/SiC复合材料应用研究历程及启示. 航空材料学报, 2025, 45(2): 1.
DOI |
| [4] | 刘虎, 束小文, 洪智亮, 等. 航空发动机用SiC/SiC复合材料典型元件设计及性能评价研究进展. 材料导报, 2023, 37(14): 12. |
| [5] | ASTM International. Standard test method for open-hole tensile strength of fiber-reinforced advanced ceramic composites: ASTM C1869-18. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2023. |
| [6] | KALLURI S, VERRILLI M J. Influence of holes on the in-plane tensile strength and fatigue durability of a Nicalon™/Si-N-C ceramic matrix composite. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, 2003, 24(4): 427. |
| [7] |
HAQUE A, AHMED L, RAMASETTY A. Stress concentrations and notch sensitivity in woven ceramic matrix composites containing a circular hole—an experimental, analytical, and finite element study. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2005, 88(8): 2195.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
GYEKENYESI A L, MORSCHER G N. Damage progression and stress redistribution in notched SiC/SiC composites. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2010, 19(9): 1298.
DOI URL |
| [9] | GYEKENYESI A L, MORSCHER G N. Evaluating the mechanical behavior of notched SiC/SiC composites using thermoelastic stress analysis. Proceedings of SPIE, Bellingham, 2004: 456-465. |
| [10] | MORSCHER G N, GYEKENYESI J Z, GYEKENYESI A L. Mechanical behavior of notched SiC/SiC composites. ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress, New Orleans, 2001: 1-7. |
| [11] |
RUGGLES-WRENN M B, KURTZ G. Notch sensitivity of fatigue behavior of a Hi-Nicalon™/SiC-B4C composite at 1,200 ℃ in air and in steam. Applied Composite Materials, 2013, 20: 891.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
GOWAYED Y, OJARD G, CHEN J, et al. Accumulation of time-dependent strain during dwell-fatigue experiments of iBN- Sylramic melt infiltrated SiC/SiC composites with and without holes. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2011, 42(12): 2020.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
MCNULTY J C, HE M Y, ZOK F W. Notch sensitivity of fatigue life in a Sylramic™/SiC composite at elevated temperature. Composites Science and Technology, 2001, 61(9): 1331.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
SANTHOSH U, AHMAD J, JOHN R, et al. Modeling of stress concentration in ceramic matrix composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 45: 1156.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
GUAN X Y, WANG Y N, JIAO J, et al. Hierarchical modeling of strain-concentrating effect in notched ceramic-matrix composite laminates. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2025, 304: 110641.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
LIU H, LI L B, WANG Y N, et al. In situ damage propagation and fracture in notched cross-ply SiC/SiC composites: experiment and numerical modeling. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2024, 44(4): 2052.
DOI URL |
| [17] | 刘海龙. SiC/SiC陶瓷基复合材料力学性能与失效机理研究. 上海: 上海交通大学硕士学位论文, 2020. |
| [18] | PETERSON R E, PLUNKETT R. Stress concentration factors. Naval Engineers Journal, 2010, 67(3): 697. |
| [19] |
MORSCHER G N. Stress-dependent matrix cracking in 2D woven SiC-fiber reinforced melt-infiltrated SiC matrix composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2004, 64(9): 1311.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
MORSCHER G N, MAXWELL R. Monitoring tensile fatigue crack growth and fiber failure around a notch in laminate SiC/SiC composites utilizing acoustic emission, electrical resistance, and digital image correlation. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2019, 39(2/3): 229.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
BACHE M R, NEWTON C D, JONES J P, et al. Advances in damage monitoring techniques for the detection of failure in SiCf/SiC ceramic matrix composites. Ceramics, 2019, 2(2): 347.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
DASSIOS K G, AGGELIS D G, KORDATOS E Z, et al. Cyclic loading of a SiC-fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composite reveals damage mechanisms and thermal residual stress state. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2013, 44: 105.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
MORSCHER G N, FERGUSON C, PRATT S, et al. Acoustic emission accuracy from a tensile test of a ceramic matrix composite. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2024, 107(12): 8556.
DOI URL |
| [1] | CHEN Bin, REN Ke, WANG Yiguang. Evolution of Mechanical Properties of Mini-SiCf/SiC Composites at High Temperatures over a Long Period of Time [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2025, 40(9): 971-980. |
| [2] | WU Xiaochen, ZHENG Ruixiao, LI Lu, MA Haolin, ZHAO Peihang, MA Chaoli. Research Progress on In-situ Monitoring of Damage Behavior of SiCf/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites at High Temperature Environments [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 39(6): 609-622. |
| [3] | LI Guangyu, YUE Yifan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Chengyu, SUO Tao, LI Yulong. Damage of 2D-SiC/SiC Composites under Projectile Impact and Tensile Properties after Impact [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 39(5): 494-500. |
| [4] | SHEN Xuanyi, MA Qin, XUE Yudong, LIAO Chunjin, ZHU Min, ZHANG Xiangyu, YANG Jinshan, DONG Shaoming. Effects of Multilayered Interfaces on Mechanical Damage of SiCf/SiC Composites [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(8): 917-922. |
| [5] | ZHANG Yachen, MENG Jia, CAI Kun, SHENG Xiaochen, LE Jun, SONG Lixin. Bending Failure Mechanism Study of Si-Cr-Ti High Temperature Oxidation Resistance Coating via Acoustic Emission Technique [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(11): 1185-1192. |
| [6] | LI Longbin, XUE Yudong, HU Jianbao, YANG Jinshan, ZHANG Xiangyu, DONG Shaoming. Influence of SiC Nanowires on the Damage Evolution of SiCf/SiC Composites [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, 36(10): 1111-1117. |
| [7] | ZHANG Yongzhen, TONG Xiaoyan, YAO Leijiang, LI Bin, BAI Guodong. Acoustic Emission Pattern Recognition on Tensile Damage Process of C/SiC Composites Using an Improved Genetic Algorithm [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2020, 35(5): 593-600. |
| [8] | HUANG Xi-Peng, WANG Bo, YANG Cheng-Peng, PAN Wen-Ge, LIU Xiao-Ying. Evaluating Damage Evolution of Three-dimension Needled C/SiC Composite Based on Acoustic Emission Signal Analysis [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2018, 33(6): 609-616. |
| [9] | DENG Qi-Huang, WANG Lian-Jun, XU Hong-Jie, WANG Hong-Zhi, JIANG Wan. Fatigue Life Investigation of PZT Ceramics by MSP Method [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2012, 27(10): 1047-1052. |
| [10] | PAN Wen-Ge,JIAO Gui-Qiong,WANG Bo,GUAN Guo-Yang. Characterizing Damage Evolution of Three-dimensional Braided C/SiC Composite with AE Technology [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2004, 19(4): 871-875. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||