Research Paper

Theory and Experiment Research on MSP Evaluation Method for Si3N4
Ceramic Creep Properties

  • CHEN Gang ,
  • ZHAI Peng-Cheng ,
  • ZHANG Qing-Jie
Expand
  • (1. School of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Received date: 2009-03-16

  Revised date: 2009-04-16

  Online published: 2009-09-20

Abstract

Theory research of MSP(Modified Small Punch)creep test was performed based on the thin plate bending creep model and the theory formula of creep stress exponent was established. A numerical study was carried out to simulate MSP creep tests by using the finite element software MARC. The creep stress exponent adopted in the numerical simulation was compared with the evaluation result. It is found that differences are 1.6% and 2.7% for 12Cr1MoV steel and tungsten-alloyed 9% Cr steel, respectively. The difference between the MSP creep test result of SUS304 stainless steel and the traditionally uniaxial creep test result is only 2.9%. The validity of the theory formula is verified by the consistency of numerical simulation results and by the excellent agreement with the experimental results. Based on the research of the creep properties of Si3N4 ceramic, it is found that there are both preferable ductibility and obvious creep deformation at 1000℃. The creep stress exponent of Si3N4 ceramic is obtained by using the theory formula. The results indicate that the MSP creep test method has wide application for the evaluation of high temperature creep properties of nonmetal materials.

Cite this article

CHEN Gang , ZHAI Peng-Cheng , ZHANG Qing-Jie . Theory and Experiment Research on MSP Evaluation Method for Si3N4
Ceramic Creep Properties[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2009
, 24(5) : 924 -928 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1077.2009.00924

References

[1]Baik J M, Kameda J, Buck O. Scripta Metallurgica, 1983, 17(12): 1443-1447.
[2]Li J F, Kawasaki A, Watanabe R. J. Jpn. Inst. Metals, 1992, 56: 1450-1456.
[3]Dobes F, Milicka K. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2002, 336(1/2): 245-248.
[4]Dobes F, Milicka K. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2001, 29(1): 31-35.
[5]Ule B, Sustar T. Materials at High Temperatures, 2001, 18(3): 163-170.
[6]Dobes F, Milicka K. Materials Characterization, 2008, 59(7): 961-964.
[7]Ule B, Sustar T, Dobes F, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1999, 192(1): 1-11.
[8]Saucedo-Munoz M L, Komazaki S, Takahashi T, et al. Journal of Materials Research, 2002, 17(8): 1945-1953.
[9]Komazai S, Hashida T, Shoji T, et al. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2000, 28(4): 249-256.
[10]Hyde T H, Sun W, Becker A A. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1996, 38(10): 1089-1102.
[11]Dobes F, Milicka K, Kratochvil P. Intermetallics, 2004, 12(12): 1397-1401.
[12]Yang Z, Wang Z W. International Journal of Pressure and Piping, 2003, 80(6): 397-404.
[13]陈玉新, 凌 祥, 涂善东. 实验力学, 2005, 20(2): 219-225.
[14]熊 智, 彭青松, 白光照, 等(XIONG Zhi, et al). 无机材料学报(Journal of Inorganic Materials), 2005,20(6): 1379-1384.
[15]江 莞, 熊 智, 王连军. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2007, 36(2): 343-346.
[16]江 莞, 王 刚, 吴历斌, 等(JIANG Wan, et al). 无机材料学报(Journal of Inorganic Materials), 2002, 17(4): 827-832.
[17]江 莞, 白光照, 王 刚, 等(JIANG Wan, et al). 无机材料学报(Journal of Inorganic Materials), 2002, 17(5): 1034-1040.
[18]穆霞英. 蠕变力学. 西安:西安交通大学出版社, 1990:88-99.
[19]Zhai P C, Hashida T, Komazaki S, et al. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2004, 32(4): 298-303.
[20]尤英俊. 小冲孔试样高温蠕变损伤的有限元模拟. 南京: 南京工业大学硕士论文, 2004.
Outlines

/